A Model-Theoretic Approach for Recovering Consistent Data from Inconsistent Knowledge-Bases
Graduate studies at Western
|Abstract||One of the most signi cant drawbacks of classical logic is its being useless in the presence of an inconsistency. Nevertheless, the classical calculus is a very convenient framework to work with. In this work we propose means for drawing conclusions from systems that are based on classical logic, although the informationmightbe inconsistent. The idea is to detect those parts of the knowledge-base that \cause" the inconsistency, and isolate the parts that are \recoverable". We do this by temporarily switching into Ginsberg/Fitting multi-valued framework of bilattices (which is a common framework for logic programmingand nonmonotonic reasoning). Our method is conservative in the sense that it considers the contradictory data as useless and regards all the remaining information una ected. The resulting logic is nonmonotonic, paraconsistent, and a plausibility logic in the sense of Lehmann|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|External links||This entry has no external links. Add one.|
|Through your library||Only published papers are available at libraries|
Similar books and articles
David Ripley (forthcoming). Inconstancy and Inconsistency. In Petr Cintula, Christian Fermuller, Lluis Godo & Petr Hajek (eds.), Reasoning Under Vagueness. College Publications.
Graham Priest (1991). Minimally Inconsistent LP. Studia Logica 50 (2):321 - 331.
Greg Restall (2002). Paraconsistency Everywhere. Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 43 (3):147-156.
Jan Doroszewski (1988). Ethical and Methodological Aspects of Medical Computer Data Bases and Knowledge Bases. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 9 (2).
Peter K. Schotch (1992). Paraconsistent Logic: The View From the Right. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1992:421 - 429.
Salem Benferhat, Didier Dubois & Henri Prade (1997). Some Syntactic Approaches to the Handling of Inconsistent Knowledge Bases: A Comparative Study Part 1: The Flat Case. Studia Logica 58 (1):17-45.
John Grant & V. S. Subrahmanian (2000). Applications of Paraconsistency in Data and Knowledge Bases. Synthese 125 (1-2):121-132.
Ofer Arieli & Arnon Avron (1996). Reasoning with Logical Bilattices. Journal of Logic, Language and Information 5 (1):25--63.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads9 ( #122,437 of 739,319 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,243 of 739,319 )
How can I increase my downloads?