David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Synthese 159 (1):23-45 (2007)
In Carnap’s autobiography, he tells the story how one night in January 1931, “the whole theory of language structure” in all its ramifications “came to [him] like a vision”. The shorthand manuscript he produced immediately thereafter, he says, “was the first version” of Logical Syntax of Language. This document, which has never been examined since Carnap’s death, turns out not to resemble Logical Syntax at all, at least on the surface. Wherein, then, did the momentous insight of 21 January 1931 consist? We seek to answer this question by placing Carnap’s shorthand manuscript in the context of his previous efforts to accommodate scientific theories and meta- linguistic claims within Wittgenstein’s Tractatus theory of meaning. The breakthrough of January 1931 consists, from this viewpoint, in the rejection of the Tractatus theory in favor of the meta-mathematical perspective of Hilbert, Gödel, and Tarski. This was not yet the standpoint of the published Logical Syntax, as we show, but led naturally to the “principle of tolerance” and thus to Carnap’s mature philosophy, in which the inconsistencies between this first view and the principle of tolerance, which survived into the published Syntax, were overcome
|Keywords||Rudolf Carnap Kurt Gödel Ludwig Wittgenstein Logical Syntax of Language Vienna Circle|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
S. Awodey & A. W. Carus (2001). Carnap, Completeness, and Categoricity:The Gabelbarkeitssatz OF 1928. [REVIEW] Erkenntnis 54 (2):145-172.
Rudolf Carnap (1932). Über Protokollsätze. Erkenntnis 3 (1):215-228.
Rudolf Carnap (1930). Die Alte Und Die Neue Logik. Erkenntnis 1 (1):12-26.
Rudolf Carnap (1931). Die Physikalische Sprache Als Universalsprache der Wissenschaft. Erkenntnis 2 (1):432--65.
Rudolf Carnap (1950). Empiricism, Semantics, and Ontology. Revue Internationale de Philosophie 4 (2):20--40.
Citations of this work BETA
Georg Schiemer (2013). Carnap's Early Semantics. Erkenntnis 78 (3):487-522.
Similar books and articles
Alexei Angelides (2012). Carnap's 1934 Objections to Wittgenstein's Say/Show Distinction. Erkenntnis 76 (2):147-169.
Pierre Wagner (ed.) (2009). Carnap's Logical Syntax of Language. Palgrave Macmillan.
Warren Goldfarb (2009). Carnap's Syntax Programme and the Philosophy of Mathematics. In Pierre Wagner (ed.), Carnap's Logical Syntax of Language. Palgrave Macmillan.
Gregory Lavers (2008). Carnap, Formalism, and Informal Rigour. Philosophia Mathematica 16 (1):4-24.
Pierre Wagner (2009). The Analysis of Philosophy in Logical Syntax : Carnap's Critique and His Attempt at a Reconstruction. In , Carnap's Logical Syntax of Language. Palgrave Macmillan. 184--202.
Thomas Uebel (2009). Carnap's Logical Syntax in the Context of the Vienna Circle. In Pierre Wagner (ed.), Carnap's Logical Syntax of Language. Palgrave Macmillan.
Richard Creath (2009). The Gentle Strength of Tolerance : The Logical Syntax of Language and Carnap's Philosophical Programme. In Pierre Wagner (ed.), Carnap's Logical Syntax of Language. Palgrave Macmillan. 203--214.
Rudolf Carnap (1937). The Logical Syntax of Language. London, K. Paul, Trench, Trubner & Co., Ltd..
Steve Awodey & A. W. Carus (2009). From Wittgenstein's Prison to the Boundless Ocean : Carnap's Dream of Logical Syntax. In Pierre Wagner (ed.), Carnap's Logical Syntax of Language. Palgrave Macmillan.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads97 ( #12,954 of 1,099,910 )
Recent downloads (6 months)9 ( #27,943 of 1,099,910 )
How can I increase my downloads?