The Proceedings of the Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy 1999:77-89 (1999)
|Abstract||The criteria of “forced, live, and momentous options,” as William James utilized them in his pragmatic defense of religious belief, cannot, I argue, both support religious pluralism and acknowledge lessons about failure of epistemic responsibility in Heaven’s Gate-followers. But I attempt to re-vitalize the pragmatic argument, showing it capable of walking this narrow line. I proceed (1) by developing the distinction and relationship between a commitment to a particular religious system or community, and a commitment to the generic “religious hypothesis” itself; and (2) by explicating and expanding upon the “experimental” status—and associated pragmatic criteria for success or failure—that James already recognized for commitments to particular religious communities. I thus show how the “pragmatic argument” takes on heightened significance—and renewed promise—in light of problems associated with New Age and so-called “cult” religiosity|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Tadd Ruetenik (2006). Does a 'Cosmic Consciousness' Exist? Immortality and Ethics in James' Religious Pragmatism. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 42 (3):417-430.
John R. Shook (2011). Peirce's Pragmatic Theology and Stoic Religious Ethics1. Journal of Religious Ethics 39 (2):344-363.
Sandra B. Rosenthal (2006). Experience, Experimentalism, and Religious Overbelief. The Proceedings of the Twenty-First World Congress of Philosophy 8:129-134.
David Henderson (2009). Motivated Contextualism. Philosophical Studies 142 (1):119 - 131.
Philip L. Quinn (2003). Gale on a Pragmatic Argument for Religious Belief. Philo 6 (1):59-66.
Yong Li (2006). The Divine Command Theory of Mozi. Asian Philosophy 16 (3):237 – 245.
Guy Axtell (forthcoming). Possibility and Permission? Intellectual Character, Inquiry, and the Ethics of Belief. In Pihlstrom S. & Rydenfelt H. (eds.), William James on Religion. (Palgrave McMillan “Philosophers in Depth” Series.
Friedrich Hügel (1921/1974). Essays & Addresses on the Philosophy of Religion. Westport, Conn.,Greenwood Press.
Celal Türer (2006). The Challenge of William James's Philosophy of Religion. The Proceedings of the Twenty-First World Congress of Philosophy 8:25-30.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2011-01-09
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?