There is no place for intelligent design in the philosophy of biology : intelligent design is not science
In Francisco José Ayala & Robert Arp (eds.), Contemporary Debates in Philosophy of Biology. Wiley-Blackwell Pub. (2010)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,705 |
| External links | This entry has no external links. Add one. |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesJ. Shearmur (2010). Steve Fuller and Intelligent Design. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 40 (3):433-445.
Ratzscdelh (2010). There is a Place for Intelligent Design in the Philosophy of Biology : Intelligent Design in (Philosophy of) Biology : Some Legitimate Roles. In Francisco José Ayala & Robert Arp (eds.), Contemporary Debates in Philosophy of Biology. Wiley-Blackwell Pub..
Del Ratzsch (2010). There is a Place for Intelligent Design in the Philosophy of Biology : Intelligent Design in (Philosophy of) Biology : Some Legitimate Roles. In Francisco José Ayala & Robert Arp (eds.), Contemporary Debates in Philosophy of Biology. Wiley-Blackwell Pub..
Jeffrey Koperski (2003). Intelligent Design and the End of Science. American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 77 (4):567-588.
Analytics
Monthly downloads
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
|
Added to index2010-05-19Total downloads0Recent downloads (6 months)0How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
