David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
History and Theory 40 (4):143–152 (2001)
Theories of revolution invoke human agency to commit the violence that revolution entails, yet theorists of revolution often denounce the general theory of human agency called rational choice because it does not explain macrosocial facts like revolution and also leaves out culture. Actually, however, rational choice is the major premise of any cogent explanation of revolution, and it includes culture as a factual premise. Rational-choice theory applied to explaining revolution dates back to Thucydides, whose method of explanation is sound and whose theory of revolution is true. Thucydides explains the macrosocial fact of revolution by way of models whose elements are people doing what they hope will succeed, that is, acting on opinion alias culture. Theorists of revolution who make sense of it all rehearse Thucydides: they analyze the narrative history into strategic actions and reactions, explain these actions and reactions by rational choice, and document the explanation with direct and circumstantial evidence for hope of success, though they seldom own up on theory and method or preach what they practice
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Bertrand Russell (1905). On Denoting. Mind 14 (56):479-493.
John G. McEvoy (2000). In Search of the Chemical Revolution: Interpretive Strategies in the History of Chemistry. Foundations of Chemistry 2 (1):47-73.
S. A. Lloyd (2002). Liberty, Rationality, and Agency in Hobbes's Leviathan (Review). Journal of the History of Philosophy 40 (3):397-398.
Karsten R. Stueber (2000). Understanding Other Minds and the Problem of Rationality. In K. R. Stueber & H. H. Kogaler (eds.), Empathy and Agency: The Problem of Understanding in the Human Sciences. Boulder: Westview Press
Lorne Tepperman (1985). Informatics and Society: Will There Be an 'Information Revolution'? [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 4 (5):395 - 399.
Jay M. Smith (2001). Between Discourse and Experience: Agency and Ideas in the French Pre-Revolution. History and Theory 40 (4):116–142.
Luca Ferrero (2009). Constitutivism and the Inescapability of Agency. Oxford Studies in Metaethics 4:303-333.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads38 ( #106,742 of 1,796,591 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #346,490 of 1,796,591 )
How can I increase my downloads?