Has Austin refuted the sense-datum theory?

Synthese 17 (1):117-140 (1967)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Austin on sense-data: Ordinary language analysis as 'therapy'.Eugen Fischer - 2006 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 70 (1):67-99.
Austin on perception.W. F. R. Hardie - 1963 - Philosophy 38 (July):253-263.
Sense-data and J.l. Austin: A re-examination.A. D. P. Kalansuriya - 1981 - Indian Philosophical Quarterly 8 (April):357-371.
Austin and the argument from illusion.Roderick Firth - 1964 - Philosophical Review 73 (July):372-382.
Adjusters and sense-data.Sam C. Coval & D. D. Todd - 1972 - American Philosophical Quarterly 9 (1):107-112.
Perception.Howard Robinson - 1994 - New York: Routledge.
Metaphysics and common sense.Alfred Jules Ayer - 1967 - San Francisco,: Freeman, Cooper.
Austin and perception.Charles Sayward - 2001 - Acta Analytica 16 (27):169-193.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
413 (#45,938)

6 months
29 (#104,868)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

Perception and computation.Jonathan Cohen - 2010 - Philosophical Issues 20 (1):96-124.
Sense-data.Michael Huemer - 2005 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Oxford realism: Knowledge and perception II.Mathieu Marion - 2000 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 8 (3):485 – 519.

View all 11 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references