Has Austin refuted the sense-datum theory?
Synthese 17 (June):117-140 (1967)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | Epistemology Perception Sense Data Austin | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,875 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesJ. L. Austin (1964). Sense And Sensibilia; Reconstructed From The Manuscript Notes By G J Warnock. Oxford University Press.
A. J. Ayer (1970). Metaphysics and Common Sense. San Francisco,Freeman, Cooper.
Howard M. Robinson (1994). Perception. New York: Routledge.
Sam C. Coval & D. D. Todd (1972). Adjusters and Sense-Data. American Philosophical Quarterly 9 (January):107-112.
Roderick Firth (1964). Austin and the Argument From Illusion. Philosophical Review 73 (July):372-382.
A. D. P. Kalansuriya (1981). Sense-Data and J.L. Austin: A Re-Examination. Indian Philosophical Quarterly 8 (April):357-371.
W. F. R. Hardie (1963). Austin on Perception. Philosophy 38 (July):253-263.
Eugen Fischer (2005). Austin on Sense-Data: Ordinary Language Analysis as 'Therapy'. Grazer Philosophische Studien 70 (1):67-99.
Stephen H. Bickham (1975). What is at Issue in the Ayer-Austin Dispute About Sense-Data. Midwestern Journal of Philosophy 1:1-8.
Charles Sayward (2001). Austin and Perception. Acta Analytica 16 (27):169-193.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads150 ( #2,654 of 556,888 )Recent downloads (6 months)5 ( #16,193 of 556,888 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
