Graduate studies at Western
Journal of Business Ethics 57 (2):121 - 137 (2005)
|Abstract||Organizations are increasingly embedded with consultants and other non-employees who have the opportunity to engage in wrongdoing. However, research exploring the reporting intentions of employees regarding the discovery of wrongdoing by consultants is scant. It is important to examine reporting intentions in this setting given the enhanced presence of consultants in organizations and the fact that wrongdoing by consultants changes a key characteristic of the wrongdoing. Using an experimental approach, the current paper reports the results of a study examining employees reporting intentions subsequent to their discovery of wrongdoing by a consultant. The results of the study indicate that perceptions about the seriousness of a wrongdoing, personal costs and personal responsibility related to reporting a wrongdoing, and moral-equity judgments are significantly associated with reporting intentions for a normal (non-anonymous) reporting channel. Only perceptions of seriousness and personal costs are significantly associated for an anonymous reporting channel. Lastly, while personal costs for the anonymous reporting channel were lower than the normal reporting channel, reporting intentions were similar across the two channels|
|Keywords||moral-equity personal cost personal responsibility reporting channels seriousness wrongdoing|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Hans Rämö (2011). Visualizing the Phronetic Organization: The Case of Photographs in CSR Reports. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 104 (3):371-387.
Dilek Zamantili Nayir & Christian Herzig (2012). Value Orientations as Determinants of Preference for External and Anonymous Whistleblowing. Journal of Business Ethics 107 (2):197-213.
Marcia P. Miceli, Janet P. Near & Terry Morehead Dworkin (2009). A Word to the Wise: How Managers and Policy-Makers Can Encourage Employees to Report Wrongdoing. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 86 (3):379 - 396.
Jessica R. Mesmer-Magnus & Chockalingam Viswesvaran (2005). Whistleblowing in Organizations: An Examination of Correlates of Whistleblowing Intentions, Actions, and Retaliation. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 62 (3):277 - 297.
Marcia P. Miceli (2004). Does Type of Wrongdoing Affect the Whistle-Blowing Process? Business Ethics Quarterly 14 (2):219-242.
Mary B. Curtis (2006). Are Audit-Related Ethical Decisions Dependent Upon Mood? Journal of Business Ethics 68 (2):191 - 209.
Granville King (2001). Perceptions of Intentional Wrongdoing and Peer Reporting Behavior Among Registered Nurses. Journal of Business Ethics 34 (1):1 - 13.
Steven E. Kaplan & Joseph J. Schultz (2007). Intentions to Report Questionable Acts: An Examination of the Influence of Anonymous Reporting Channel, Internal Audit Quality, and Setting. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 71 (2):109 - 124.
Tim Barnett, Ken Bass & Gene Brown (1996). Religiosity, Ethical Ideology, and Intentions to Report a Peer's Wrongdoing. Journal of Business Ethics 15 (11):1161 - 1174.
Steven Kaplan, Kurt Pany, Janet Samuels & Jian Zhang (2009). An Examination of the Association Between Gender and Reporting Intentions for Fraudulent Financial Reporting. Journal of Business Ethics 87 (1):15 - 30.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads7 ( #142,473 of 739,489 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,680 of 739,489 )
How can I increase my downloads?