Graduate studies at Western
Philosophia Mathematica 18 (1):74-101 (2010)
|Abstract||An extensive exploration of the special properties of ‘exist’ is here undertaken. Two of several results are: Denying that `exist’ has associated with it a set of necessary and sufficient conditions has seemed to a number of philosophers to imply metaphysical nihilism . This is because it has seemed that without such conditions the target domain of `existence’ is arbitrarily open. I show this is wrong. Second, my analysis sheds light on the puzzling question of what we are asking when we ask of something, `Does it exist?’ and mean that question in an ontically relevant way|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Similar books and articles
Dale Jacquette (2006). Propositions, Sets, and Worlds. Studia Logica 82 (3):337 - 343.
Marc Ereshefsky (2010). Darwin's Solution to the Species Problem. Synthese 175 (3):405 - 425.
Galen Strawson (2009). Selves: An Essay in Revisionary Metaphysics. Oxford University Press Inc..
James M. Fielding & Dirk Marwede (2012). The Anatomy of the Image: Toward an Applied Onto-Psychiatry. Philosophy, Psychiatry, and Psychology 18 (4):287-303.
Jonathan Schaffer (2009). On What Grounds What. In David Manley, David J. Chalmers & Ryan Wasserman (eds.), Metametaphysics: New Essays on the Foundations of Ontology. Oxford University Press.
Added to index2010-02-06
Total downloads106 ( #7,021 of 740,832 )
Recent downloads (6 months)4 ( #20,740 of 740,832 )
How can I increase my downloads?