David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Symposium: The Canadian Journal of Continental Philosophy 15 (1):110-145 (2011)
Adorno, no less than Heidegger or Nietzsche, had his own critical notions of truth/untruth. But Adorno’s readers are unsettled by the barest hint of anything that might be taken to be antiscience. To protest scientism, yes and to be sure, but to protest “scientific thought,” decidedly not, and the distinction is to be maintained even if Adorno himself challenged it. For Adorno, so-called “scientistic” tendencies are the very “conditions of society and of scientific thought.” And again, Adorno’s readers tend to refuse criticism of this kind. Scientific rationality cannot itself be problematic and E. B. Ashton, Adorno’s translator in the mid-1960s, sought to underscore this with the word “scientivistic.” Rather than science, it is scientism that is to be avoided. So we ask: is Adorno speaking here of scientific rationality or scientistic rationality? How, in general, are we to read Adorno?
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Martin Seel (2004). Adorno's Contemplative Ethics. Critical Horizons 5 (1):259-269.
Joseph D. Lewandowski (1996). Adorno on Jazz and Society. Philosophy and Social Criticism 22 (5):103-121.
Roger Foster (2007). Adorno and Heidegger on Language and the Inexpressible. Continental Philosophy Review 40 (2):187-204.
David Jenemann (2007). Adorno in America. University of Minnesota Press.
David Sherman (2001). Adorno's Kierkegaardian Debt. Philosophy and Social Criticism 27 (1):77-106.
J. M. Bernstein (2001). Adorno: Disenchantment and Ethics. Cambridge University Press.
Deborah Cook (2001). Adorno, Ideology and Ideology Critique. Philosophy and Social Criticism 27 (1):1-20.
Nick Smith (2007). Adorno Vs. Levinas: Evaluating Points of Contention. [REVIEW] Continental Philosophy Review 40 (3):275-306.
Tom Huhn (ed.) (2004). The Cambridge Companion to Adorno. Cambridge University Press.
Bed P. Paudyal (2009). Mimesis in Adorno's Aesthetic Theory. Journal of Philosophy: A Cross-Disciplinary Inquiry 4 (8):1-10.
Dan Webb (2009). `If Adorno Isn't the Devil, It's Because He's a Jew': Lyotard's Misreading of Adorno Through Thomas Mann's Dr Faustus. Philosophy and Social Criticism 35 (5):517-531.
Karen S. Feldman (2011). Not Dialectical Enough: On Benjamin, Adorno, and Autonomous Critique. Philosophy and Rhetoric 44 (4):336-362.
Yvonne Sherratt (2002). Adorno's Positive Dialectic. Cambridge University Press.
Added to index2012-03-18
Total downloads6 ( #206,947 of 1,102,926 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #297,281 of 1,102,926 )
How can I increase my downloads?