From Fleck's denkstil to Kuhn's paradigm: Conceptual schemes and incommensurability
International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 17 (1):75 – 92 (2003)
| Abstract | This article argues that the limited influence of Ludwik Fleck's ideas on philosophy of science is due not only to their indirect dissemination by way of Thomas Kuhn, but also to an incommensurability between the standard conceptual framework of history and philosophy of science and Fleck's own more integratedly historico-social and praxis-oriented approach to understanding the evolution of scientific discovery. What Kuhn named "paradigm" offers a periphrastic rendering or oblique translation of Fleck's Denkstil/Denkkollektiv , a derivation that may also account for the lability of the term "paradigm". This was due not to Kuhn's unwillingness to credit Fleck but rather to the cold war political circumstances surrounding the writing of The Structure of Scientific Revolutions . Following a discussion of Fleck's anatomical allusions, I include a brief discussion of Aristotle (on menstruation and darkened mirrors) and conclude with a reference to the productivity of error in Mach and Nietzsche. | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,701 |
| External links |
  Try with proxy. |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesDavid Stump (1988). The Role of Skill in Experimentation: Reading Ludwik Fleck's Study of the Wasserman Reaction as an Example of Ian Hacking's Experimental Realism. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1988:302 - 308.
Paul Hoyningen-Huene (1993). Reconstructing Scientific Revolutions: Thomas S. Kuhn's Philosophy of Science. University of Chicago Press.
Eva Hedfors (2006). The Reading of Ludwik Fleck: Questions of Sources and Impetus. Social Epistemology 20 (2):131 – 161.
Johannes Fehr (2012). “… The Art of Shaping a Democratic Reality and Being Directed by It …”—Philososophy of Science in Turbulent Times. Studies in East European Thought 64 (1-2):81-89.
Vasso P. Kindi (1995). Kuhn'sthe Structure of Scientific Revolutions Revisited. Journal for General Philosophy of Science 26 (1):75 - 92.
Thaddeus J. Trenn (1981). Ludwik Fleck's 'on the Question of the Foundations of Medical Knowledge'. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 6 (3):237-256.
Alexander Peine (2011). Challenging Incommensurability: What We Can Learn From Ludwik Fleck for the Analysis of Configurational Innovation. Minerva 49 (4):489-508.
Babette E. Babich (2003). Kuhn's Paradigm as a Parable for the Cold War: Incommensurability and its Discontents From Fuller's Tale of Harvard to Fleck's Unsung Lvov. Social Epistemology 17 (2 & 3):99 – 109.
Stig Brorson & Hanne Andersen (2001). Stabilizing and Changing Phenomenal Worlds: Ludwik Fleck and Thomas Kuhn on Scientific Literature. Journal for General Philosophy of Science 32 (1):109-129.
Nicola Mößner (2011). Thought Styles and Paradigms—a Comparative Study of Ludwik Fleck and Thomas S. Kuhn. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 42 (2):362–371.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads44 ( #25,360 of 549,127 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,361 of 549,127 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
