The Use of Husserl's Method in Bernard Lonergan's Trinitarian Theology

Philosophy and Theology 21 (1/2):43-104 (2009)
The question that arises in this article is whether we can find elements of phenomenology in Bernard Lonergan’s Trinitarian theology.With help of other Lonergan scholars, I have discovered that modern thinking plays an important role in the theology and philosophy ofthis Jesuit author. Moreover, the terminology of modern philosophy coexists with the terminology of classical and especially Tomisticthought. This article is interested in the elements that Lonergan takes from the modern philosophy and emphasizes the centrality ofHusserlian phenomenology among the other modern authors used by Lonergan. Following the research of the Jesuit thinker, I speakabout two parallel realities coexisting in his Trinitarian theology. Lonergan tries to realize their synthesis, but at the same time healso recognizes their distinctiveness. The most relevant result of this coexistence is obtained through the replacement of the metaphysical differentiation between the level of substance and the level of the three Persons, so that, instead of having the elements of classical theology, Lonergan predicates at the same time that God subsists as well as the Trinitarian Persons subsist. Through this assertion he emphasizes the identity between God’s existence and the existence of the three divine Persons, and eliminates the classical differentiation that might be closer to the danger of subordinating the three Persons to the one God
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.5840/philtheol2009211/23
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
Download options
PhilPapers Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 23,201
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Neil Ormerod (1999). “It Is Easy to See”. Philosophy and Theology 11 (2):257-264.
Paul Kidder (2003). The Lonergan-Heidegger Difference. Philosophy and Theology 15 (2):273-298.
Lubos Rojka (2008). Human Authenticity and the Question of God in the Philosophy of Bernard Lonergan. Forum Philosophicum: International Journal for Philosophy 13 (1):31 - 49.
Tad Dunne (2003). Bernard Lonergan. Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Roland Teske (1990). Bradley and Lonergan's Relativist. Philosophy and Theology 5 (2):125-136.
William F. J. Ryan (1973). Intentionality in Edmund Husserl and Bernard Lonergan. International Philosophical Quarterly 13 (2):173-190.
Patrick H. Byrne (2007). The Goodness of Being in Lonergan's Insight. American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 81 (1):43-72.

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

37 ( #127,770 of 1,940,983 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

3 ( #272,533 of 1,940,983 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

Start a new thread
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.