How performatives really work: A reply to Searle [Book Review]

&
Linguistics and Philosophy 15 (1):93 - 110 (1992)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1007/bf00635834

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Some remarks on performatives in the law.Lennart Åqvist - 2003 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 11 (2-3):105-124.
Reflections on Searle.Douglas R. Hofstadter - 1981 - In Douglas R. Hofstadter & Daniel C. Dennett (eds.), The Mind's I. Basic Books.
Intentionality and computationalism: Minds, machines, Searle and Harnad.Michael G. Dyer - 1990 - Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Artificial Intelligence 2:303-19.
Searle's abstract argument against strong AI.Andrew Melnyk - 1996 - Synthese 108 (3):391-419.
Physical and mental? Reply to John Searle.Anthonie W. M. Meijers - 2000 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 8 (2):179 – 183.
What’s Really Going On in Searle’s “Chinese room‘.Georges Rey - 1986 - Philosophical Studies 50 (September):169-85.
Performatives are statements too.Kent Bach - 1975 - Philosophical Studies 28 (4):229 - 236.
Searle against the world : how can experiences find their objects?Kent Bach - 2007 - In Savas L. Tsohatzidis (ed.), John Searle's Philosophy of Language: Force, Meaning and Mind. Cambridge University Press.
How performatives work.John R. Searle - 1989 - Linguistics and Philosophy 12 (5):535 - 558.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
206 (#93,881)

6 months
10 (#257,583)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Kent Bach
San Francisco State University

Citations of this work

The myth of conventional implicature.Kent Bach - 1999 - Linguistics and Philosophy 22 (4):327-366.
Assertion: a (partly) social speech act.Neri Marsili & Mitchell Green - 2021 - Journal of Pragmatics 181 (August 2021):17-28.
The pragmatics of legal language.Andrei Marmor - 2008 - Ratio Juris 21 (4):423-452.
Standardization vs. conventionalization.Kent Bach - 1995 - Linguistics and Philosophy 18 (6):677 - 686.

View all 22 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

How to do things with words.John Langshaw Austin - 1962 - Oxford [Eng.]: Clarendon Press. Edited by Marina Sbisá & J. O. Urmson.
Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language.John Rogers Searle - 1969 - Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
Meaning.Herbert Paul Grice - 1957 - Philosophical Review 66 (3):377-388.
Thought and reference.Kent Bach - 1987 - New York: Clarendon Press.

View all 11 references / Add more references