Moral Epistemological Coherentism, Contextualism, and Consensualism
Croatian Journal of Philosophy 9 (1):69-89 (2009)
| Abstract | The discussion regards moral epistemology as the research of a proper methodology in moral thinking. Coherentism is proposed as the appropriate methodology in the individual context of moral thinking (because of the fact that all the alternatives to coherentism, at least understood as a regulatory ideal, are opposed to rationality), while a qualified form of consensualism is proposed as the appropriate methodology in the context of communitarian or public justification of beliefs | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,653 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesFriderik Klampfer (2005). Contextualism and Moral Justification. Croatian Journal of Philosophy 5 (3):569-582.
Joseph Shieber (2002). The Epistemic Centrality of Testimony and the Coherence of Epistemological Coherentism. In Yves Bouchard (ed.), Perspectives on Coherentism.
Peter Murphy, Coherentism. Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Nicholas Shackel (2008). Coherentism and the Symmetry of Epistemic Support. Analysis 68 (299):226–234.
Paul K. Moser (1986). Epistemic Coherentism and the Isolation Objection. Grazer Philosophische Studien 27:83-99.
Yves Bouchard (2007). The Foundationalism–Coherentism Opposition Revisited: The Case for Complementarism. Foundations of Science 12 (4).
Jonathan Kvanvig (1997). In Defense of Coherentism. Journal of Philosophical Research 22:299-306.
Frederik Herzberg (forthcoming). The Dialectics of Infinitism and Coherentism: Inferential Justification Versus Holism and Coherence. Synthese:1-23.
Robert Stern (2004). Coherence as a Test for Truth. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 69 (2):296–326.
Claudia Bianchi & Nicla Vassallo (2005). Epistemological Contextualism: A Semantic Perspective. In B. Kokinov A. Dey (ed.), Modeling and Using Context. Springer.
John Greco (2008). What's Wrong with Contextualism? Philosophical Quarterly 58 (232):416 - 436.
Thomas Grundmann (1999). BonJour's Self-Defeating Argument for Coherentism. Erkenntnis 50 (2-3):463-479.
Carson Strong (2010). Theoretical and Practical Problems with Wide Reflective Equilibrium in Bioethics. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 31 (2):123-140.
William Roche (2012). A Reply to Cling's “The Epistemic Regress Problem”. Philosophical Studies 159 (2):263-276.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2011-01-09Total downloads26 ( #47,569 of 548,984 )Recent downloads (6 months)8 ( #8,781 of 548,984 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
