Methodology in action

Journal of Economic Methodology 17 (1):3-15 (2010)
Abstract
This essay addresses the question, raised by Frank Hahn, of whether the study, by economists, of economic methodology is in practice beneficial. After considering what this statement could mean, and discussing the example of Lionel Robbins, it draws a number of conclusions: that methodological statements have unintended, context-dependent consequences, and that these may result from factors that should have nothing to do with economics.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1080/13501780903528929
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
 
Download options
PhilPapers Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 17,815
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
Tjalling C. Koopmans (1959). Three Essays on the State of Economic Science. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 10 (37):58-69.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Alex Viskovatoff (2003). Rationalism and Mainstream Economics. Journal of Economic Methodology 10 (3):397-415.
Shaun P. Hargreaves Heap (2000). Methodology Now! Journal of Economic Methodology 7 (1):95-108.

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2012-02-20

Total downloads

5 ( #416,862 of 1,780,627 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

2 ( #203,623 of 1,780,627 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Start a new thread
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.