Parochial and Universal Semantics: Semantic Typology and Little Studied Languages
| Abstract | ...the true difference between languages is not in what may or may not be expressed but in what must or must not be conveyed by the speakers. | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,631 |
| External links |
  Try with proxy. Try with proxy. |
| Through your library | Only published papers are available at libraries |
Similar books and articlesAnna Wierzbicka (1996). Semantics: Primes and Universals. Oxford University Press.
Nicholas Evans (ed.) (2011). Reciprocals and Semantic Typology. John Benjamins Pub. Company.
Mark Donohue & Søren Wichmann (eds.) (2008). The Typology of Semantic Alignment. Oxford University Press.
Swintha Danielsen & Tania Granadillo (2008). Agreement in Two Arawak Languages. In Mark Donohue & Søren Wichmann (eds.), The Typology of Semantic Alignment. Oxford University Press.
Johanna Nichols (2008). Why Are Stative-Active Languages Rare in Eurasia? In Mark Donohue & Søren Wichmann (eds.), The Typology of Semantic Alignment. Oxford University Press.
Valentin Goranko (1996). Hierarchies of Modal and Temporal Logics with Reference Pointers. Journal of Logic, Language and Information 5 (1).
Cliff Goddard (1998/2011). Semantic Analysis: A Practical Introduction. Oxford University Press.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2010-12-22Total downloads2 ( #232,211 of 548,976 )Recent downloads (6 months)0How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
