Graduate studies at Western
|Abstract||This article comments on the decision of the High Court in R (on the application of Playfoot) v Governing Body of Millais School (The 'purity ring' case) where the Court was asked to rule on whether the schools' governing body decision not to allow Lydia Playfoot to wear a silver ring as a symbol of her commitment to celibacy until marriage constituted a violation of articles 9 (freedom of thought, conscience and religion) and 14 (prohibition of discrimination) of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR). The case raises important issues in relation to religious freedom, schools and their duties under the Human Rights Act (HRA). This article seeks to highlight the extent to which the new legislation has led schools to become increasingly involved in religious matters and discusses some of the problems that may be associated with this approach.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Only published papers are available at libraries|
Similar books and articles
George Letsas (2007). A Theory of Interpretation of the European Convention on Human Rights. OUP Oxford.
Bryan R. Warnick (2012). Student Rights to Religious Expression and the Special Characteristics of Schools. Educational Theory 62 (1):59-74.
Louis Henkin (1998). Religion, Religions, and Human Rights. Journal of Religious Ethics 26 (2):229 - 239.
Ian Leigh (2011). Damned If They Do, Damned If They Don't: The European Court of Human Rights and the Protection of Religion From Attack. Res Publica 17 (1):55-73.
Douwe Korff, The Right to Life: A Guide to the Implementation of Article 2 of the European Convention on Human Rights.
Jill Marshall (2008). Women's Right to Autonomy and Identity in European Human Rights Law: Manifesting One's Religion. Res Publica 14 (3):177-192.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads14 ( #90,670 of 740,356 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,960 of 740,356 )
How can I increase my downloads?