Graduate studies at Western
Linguistics and Philosophy 22 (4):327-366 (1999)
|Abstract||Grice’s distinction between what is said and what is implicated has greatly clarified our understanding of the boundary between semantics and pragmatics. Although border disputes still arise and there are certain difficulties with the distinction itself (see the end of §1), it is generally understood that what is said falls on the semantic side and what is implicated on the pragmatic side. But this applies only to what is..|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Kent Bach (2005). Tthe Top 10 Minconceptions About Implicature. In Kent Bach (ed.), Festchrift for Larry Horn. John Benjamins.
Napoleon Katsos (2008). The Semantics/Pragmatics Interface From an Experimental Perspective: The Case of Scalar Implicature. Synthese 165 (3):385 - 401.
Jennifer M. Saul (2002). Speaker Meaning, What is Said, and What is Implicated. Noûs 36 (2):228–248.
Stephen Barker (2003). Truth and Conventional Implicature. Mind 112 (445):1-34.
Patrick Hawley (2002). What is Said. Journal of Pragmatics 34 (8):969-991.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads288 ( #701 of 739,539 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,680 of 739,539 )
How can I increase my downloads?