Graduate studies at Western
Theoria 26 (70):51-68 (2011)
|Abstract||In this article it is presented the idea that quantum electrodynamics has to be seen as a theoretical upgrade of classical electrodynamics and the theory of relativity, that permits an extension of classical theory in the description of phenomena, that while being clearly related to the conceptual framework of the classical theory – the description of matter, radiation, and their interaction – cannot be properly addressed from the classical theory. In this way quantum electrodynamics would not be a fundamental theory, and principally, we could not consider classical electrodynamics as contained in the quantum theory and being recovered from it by some sort of limiting procedure.|
|Keywords||classical electrodynamics quantum electrodynamics intertheoretical relation time|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Mathias Frisch (2009). Philosophical Issues in Electromagnetism. Philosophy Compass 4 (1):255-270.
Mathias Frisch (2004). Inconsistency in Classical Electrodynamics. Philosophy of Science 71 (4):525-549.
Rinat M. Nugayev (1996). Why Did the New Physics Force Out the Old? International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 10 (2):127 – 140.
Mario Bacelar Valente (2011). A Case for an Empirically Demonstrable Notion of the Vacuum in Quantum Electrodynamics Independent of Dynamical Fluctuations. Journal for General Philosophy of Science 42 (2):241-261.
David Atkinson (2006). Does Quantum Electrodynamics Have an Arrow of Time?☆. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B 37 (3):528-541.
F. A. Muller (2007). Inconsistency in Classical Electrodynamics? Philosophy of Science 74 (2):253-277.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads95 ( #8,742 of 740,428 )
Recent downloads (6 months)63 ( #730 of 740,428 )
How can I increase my downloads?