Kant and the Categories of Freedom
British Journal for the History of Philosophy 17 (4):799-820 (2009)
| Abstract | This paper provides an account of Kant's categories of freedom, explaining how they fit together and what role they are supposed to play. My interpretation places particular emphasis on the structural features that the table of the categories of freedom shares with the table of judgements and the table of categories laid out by Kant in the Critique of Pure Reason. In this way we can identify two interpretative constraints, namely (i) that the categories falling under each heading must form a synthetic unity whereby the third one derives from the combination of the other two. and (ii) that the first two categories falling under each heading must be morally undetermined and sensibly conditioned, while the third category is sensibly unconditioned and determined only by the moral law. | |||||||||
| Keywords | Kant Categories of freedom | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
| PhilPapers Archive |
|
| External links |
|
| Through your library | Configure |
Amie Thomasson, Categories. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Aaron M. Griffith (2010). Perception and the Categories: A Conceptualist Reading of Kant's Critique of Pure Reason. European Journal of Philosophy 20 (2):193-222.
Sally Sedgwick (2000). Longuenesse on Kant and the Priority of the Capacity to Judge. Inquiry 43 (1):81 – 90.
Jan Westerhoff (2004). The Construction of Ontological Categories. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 82 (4):595 – 620.
Dennis Schulting (2008). Deducing the Categories of Modality and Relation - Reich Revisited. In Valerio Rohden, Riccardo Terra & Guido de Almeida (eds.), Akten des 10. Internationalen Kant-Kongresses. de Gruyter.
Dennis Schulting (2010). Limitation and Idealism: Kant's 'Long' Argument From the Categories. In Dennis Schulting Jacco Verburgt (ed.), Kant's Idealism. Springer.
Dennis Schulting (2012). Kant's Deduction and Apperception: Explaining the Categories. Palgrave Macmillan.
Anil Gomes (2010). Is Kant's Transcendental Deduction of the Categories Fit for Purpose? Kantian Review 15 (2):118-137.
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-05-08Total downloads178 ( #1,716 of 549,120 )Recent downloads (6 months)69 ( #251 of 549,120 )How can I increase my downloads? |

