Graduate studies at Western
Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 6 (1):55-91 (2003)
|Abstract||Political philosophy has difficulties to cope with the complexity and variety of state-religions relations. Strict separationism is still the preferred option amongst liberals, deliberative and republican democrats, socialist and feminists. In this article, I develop a complex typology based on comparative history and sociology of religions. I summarize my reasons why institutional pluralist models like plural establishment or non-constitutional pluralism are attractive not only for religious minorities but for religiously deeply diverse societies in general. Most attention is paid defending associative democracy, the most flexible and open variety of institutional pluralism, against realist objections that group representation is incompatible with liberal democracy, that it leads to stigmatization and bureaucratization, that it strengthens undemocratic leaders, that it leads to an ossification of the status quo, and, most importantly, that it is inherently divisive undermining social cohesion and political unity. In my refutation of these objections I try to show that it helps to integrate minority religions into liberal democratic policies compatible with reasonable pluralism and to prevent religious and political fundamentalism|
|Keywords||associative democracy institutional pluralism non-constitutional pluralism plural establishment Religions and States strict separationism|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Norman Lillegard (1993). Philosophers, Theologians, and the Pluralism Problem. Philosophy and Theology 7 (4):381-403.
John Hick (1997). The Possibility of Religious Pluralism: A Reply to Gavin D'Costa. Religious Studies 33 (2):161-166.
Andrew Davis (2010). Defending Religious Pluralism for Religious Education. Ethics and Education 5 (3):189 - 202.
Derek Michaud (2008). Toward An Adequate Model for the Theology of Religions. Engaging Particularities. Chestnut Hill, MA.
Veit Bader (2003). Taking Religious Pluralism Seriously. Arguing for an Institutional Turn. Introduction. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 6 (1):3-22.
Abraham VÃ©Lez de Cea (2011). A Cross-Cultural and Buddhist-Friendly Interpretation of the Typology Exclusivism-Inclusivism-Pluralism. Sophia 50 (3):453-480.
Abraham Vélez de Cea (2011). A Cross-Cultural and Buddhist-Friendly Interpretation of the Typology Exclusivism-Inclusivism-Pluralism. Sophia 50 (3):453-480.
Gavin D'Costa (1996). The Impossibility of a Pluralist View of Religions. Religious Studies 32 (2):223 - 232.
Veit Bader (2003). Religious Diversity and Democratic Institutional Pluralism. Political Theory 31 (2):265-294.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads18 ( #74,621 of 739,447 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,680 of 739,447 )
How can I increase my downloads?