Filling in the mechanistic details: two-variable experiments as tests for constitutive relevance [Book Review]
Graduate studies at Western
European Journal for Philosophy of Science 2 (3):337-353 (2012)
|Abstract||This paper provides an account of the experimental conditions required for establishing whether correlating or causally relevant factors are constitutive components of a mechanism connecting input (start) and output (finish) conditions. I argue that two-variable experiments, where both the initial conditions and a component postulated by the mechanism are simultaneously manipulated on an independent basis, are usually required in order to differentiate between correlating or causally relevant factors and constitutively relevant ones. Based on a typical research project molecular biology, a flowchart model detailing typical stages in the formulation and testing of hypotheses about mechanistic components is also developed|
|Keywords||Molecular biology Experimentation Mechanistic explanation Causal relevance|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Carl Craver (2007). Constitutive Explanatory Relevance. Journal of Philosophical Research 32:3-20.
Arnon Levy (2009). Explaining What? Review of Explaining the Brain: Mechanisms and the Mosaic Unity of Neuroscience by Carl F. Craver. Biology and Philosophy 24 (1).
Peter Fazekas & Gergely Kertész (2011). Causation at Different Levels: Tracking the Commitments of Mechanistic Explanations. Biology and Philosophy 26 (3):365-383.
Cory D. Wright & William P. Bechtel (2007). Mechanisms and Psychological Explanation. In Paul Thagard (ed.), Philosophy of Psychology and Cognitive Science. Elsevier.
Johannes Persson (2012). Mechanistic Explanation in Social Contexts: Elster and the Problem of Local Scientific Growth. Social Epistemology 26 (1):105-114.
Jennifer Mckitrick (2005). Are Dispositions Causally Relevant? Synthese 144 (3):357 - 371.
Tudor Baetu (forthcoming). Mechanism Schemas and the Relationship Between Biological Theories. In J. Williamson P. McKay (ed.), Causality in the Sciences.
Anthony Dardis (1993). Sunburn: Independence Conditions on Causal Relevance. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 53 (3):577-598.
Jaakko Kuorikoski & Petri Ylikoski (2010). Explanatory Relevance Across Disciplinary Boundaries: The Case of Neuroeconomics. Journal of Economic Methodology 17 (2):219–228.
Carl F. Craver (2006). When Mechanistic Models Explain. Synthese 153 (3):355-376.
Alexander Powell (2009). Molecules, Cells and Minds: Aspects of Bioscientific Explanation. Dissertation, University of Exeter
Added to index2012-01-14
Total downloads17 ( #78,362 of 757,546 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,433 of 757,546 )
How can I increase my downloads?