Intended Changes Are Not Always Good, and Unintended Changes Are Not Always Bad—Why?
American Journal of Bioethics 9 (5):39-40 (2009)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,701 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesBrooke Alan Trisel (2012). Intended and Unintended Life. Philosophical Forum 43 (4):395-403.
Sophie Botros (1999). An Error About the Doctrine of Double Effect. Philosophy 74 (1):71-83.
Ronald E. Santoni (2005). The Bad Faith of Violence—and is Sartre in Bad Faith Regarding It? Sartre Studies International 11 (s 1-2):62-77.
Ralph Wedgwood (2011). Defending Double Effect. Ratio 24 (4):384-401.
Saul Smilansky (2005). On Not Being Sorry About The Morally Bad. Philosophy 80 (02).
Jenny Teichman (2003). Good for and Good About. Philosophy 78 (1):115-121.
Naomi Reshotko (2000). The Good, the Bad, and the Neither Good Nor Bad in Plato'sLysis. Southern Journal of Philosophy 38 (2):251-262.
Aaron Smuts (2012). Less Good but Not Bad: In Defense of Epicureanism About Death. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 93 (2):197-227.
Christopher V. Mirus (2012). Aristotle on Beauty and Goodness in Nature. International Philosophical Quarterly 52 (1):79-97.
Daniel Whiting (2013). The Good and the True (or the Bad and the False). Philosophy 8 (2):219-242.
Charles R. Pigden (1990). Geach on `Good'. Philosophical Quarterly 40 (159):129-154.
Alison Hills (2003). Defending Double Effect. Philosophical Studies 116 (2):133-152.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2010-09-14Total downloads6 ( #145,673 of 549,122 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,361 of 549,122 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
