Research with a purpose: A reply to my critics
Human Studies 32 (3) (2009)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | No categories specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,664 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesBrian Skyrms (1999). Review: Reply to Critics. [REVIEW] Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 59 (1):243 - 254.
Roy Sorensen (2005). Review: A Reply to Critics. [REVIEW] Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 71 (3):712 - 728.
Anthonie Meijers (2002). Reply to Critics. Techné 6 (2):110-116.
William P. Alston (1995). Reply to Critics. Journal of Philosophical Research 20:67-81.
Jerry Fodor (1993). Reply to Critics. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 53 (3).
Brian Skyrms (1999). Reply to Critics. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 59 (1):243-254.
Roy Sorensen (2005). A Reply to Critics. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 71 (3):712-728.
Allan Gibbard (2006). Reply to Critics. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 72 (3):729-744.
Roy Sorensen (2005). A Reply to Critics. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 71 (3):712–728.
Katherine Wayne & Kathleen Cranley Glass (2010). The Research Imperative Revisited Considerations for Advancing the Debate Surrounding Medical Research as Moral Imperative. Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 53 (3):373-387.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-12-21Total downloads13 ( #87,849 of 549,013 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,261 of 549,013 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
