|Abstract||This paper tries to see how the Dalits in India have subscribed themselves to the ideology of victimhood and why they are asserting their victim status; is it in the psyche of the Dalits or it is just an identity created by the political parties for their own benefit.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
|Through your library||Only published papers are available at libraries|
Similar books and articles
Nihal Randolph Henry Kuruppu, An Indian Perspective of the Relationship Between India and Australia, 1947 to 1975 : Personalities and Policies, Peaks and Troughs. [REVIEW]
Robert Meister (2002). Human Rights and the Politics of Victimhood. Ethics and International Affairs 16 (2):91–108.
Garrath Williams (2008). Dangerous Victims: On Some Political Dangers of Vicarious Claims to Victimhood. Distinktion - Scandinavian Journal of Social Theory 17:77-95.
Roy W. Perrett (1997). Religion and Politics in India: Some Philosophical Perspectives. Religious Studies 33 (1):1-14.
Kottapalli Vilsan (1983). Political Philosophy of the Oppressed Indians: A Case for Third Alternative. Booklinks Corp..
Isabelle Clark-Decès (2006). How Dalits Have Changed the Mood at Hindu Funerals: A View From South India. [REVIEW] International Journal of Hindu Studies 10 (3):257-269.
Meera Nanda (2001). A 'Broken People' Defend Science: Reconstructing the Deweyan Buddha of India's Dalits. Social Epistemology 15 (4):335 – 365.
Added to index2009-05-28
Total downloads3 ( #212,976 of 722,700 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #60,006 of 722,700 )
How can I increase my downloads?