David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of Semantics 24 (4):307-330 (2007)
In this paper we present a semantic analysis of the imperfective paradox based on the Event Calculus (van Lambalgen & Hamm 2004), a planning formalism characterizing a class of models which can be computed by connectionist networks. We report the results of a questionnaire that support the semantic theory and suggest that different aspectual classes of VPs in the progressive give rise to different entailment patterns. Further, a processing model is outlined, combining the semantic analysis with the psycholinguistic principle of immediacy in the framework of recurrent networks. The model is used to derive predictions concerning the electrophysiological correlates of the computations described by the Event Calculus
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
P. R. Graves (1997). Reference and Imperfective Paradox. Philosophical Studies 88 (1):81-101.
Alex Lascarides (1991). The Progressive and the Imperfective Paradox. Synthese 87 (3):401 - 447.
Renaat Declerck (1979). On the Progressive and the 'Imperfective Paradox'. Linguistics and Philosophy 3 (2):267 - 272.
Ashwini Deo (2009). Unifying the Imperfective and the Progressive: Partitions as Quantificational Domains. [REVIEW] Linguistics and Philosophy 32 (5):475-521.
Max Velmans (1996). Consciousness and the "Causal Paradox". Behavioral and Brain Sciences 19 (3):538-542.
David M. Sanbonmatsu, Sam Vanous, Christine Hook, Steven S. Posavac & Frank R. Kardes (2011). Whither the Alternatives: Determinants and Consequences of Selective Versus Comparative Judgemental Processing. Thinking and Reasoning 17 (4):367 - 386.
Roy T. Cook (2011). The No-No Paradox Is a Paradox. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 89 (3):467-482.
Tania Penovic & Azadehi Dastyar, Boatloads of Incongruity: The Evolution of Australia's Offshore Processing Regime.
Thomas Kroedel (2013). The Permissibility Solution to the Lottery Paradox – Reply to Littlejohn. Logos and Episteme 4 (1):103-111.
Jan van Bakel (1984). Automatic Semantic Interpretation: A Computer Model of Understanding Natural Language. Foris Publications.
D. Altshuler (2012). Aspectual Meaning Meets Discourse Coherence: A Look at the Russian Imperfective. Journal of Semantics 29 (1):39-108.
Nelson Cowan (1998). What is More Explanatory, Processing Capacity or Processing Speed? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (6):835-836.
David R. Dowty (1977). Toward a Semantic Analysis of Verb Aspect and the English 'Imperfective' Progressive. Linguistics and Philosophy 1 (1):45 - 77.
Added to index2010-09-02
Total downloads5 ( #242,321 of 1,168,878 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #140,419 of 1,168,878 )
How can I increase my downloads?