Act and intent
Journal of Philosophy 67 (19):648-658 (1970)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,672 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesDouglas Crawford-Brown & Neil E. Pearce (1989). Sufficient Proof in the Scientific Justification of Environmental Actions. Environmental Ethics 11 (2):153-167.
Kevin Gibson (1995). Fictitious Persons and Real Responsibilities. Journal of Business Ethics 14 (9):761 - 767.
George Herbert Mead (1938). The Philosophy of the Act. Chicago, Ill.,The University of Chicago Press.
Russell Haines, Marc D. Street & Douglas Haines (2008). The Influence of Perceived Importance of an Ethical Issue on Moral Judgment, Moral Obligation, and Moral Intent. Journal of Business Ethics 81 (2):387 - 399.
Bart Kemper (2004). Evil Intent and Design Responsibility. Science and Engineering Ethics 10 (2):303-309.
Frank Deaver (1990). On Defining Truth. Journal of Mass Media Ethics 5 (3):168 – 177.
Richard Ekins (2011). Legislative Intent in Law's Empire. Ratio Juris 24 (4):435-460.
Donald H. Schepers (2003). Machiavellianism, Profit, and the Dimensions of Ethical Judgment: A Study of Impact. Journal of Business Ethics 42 (4):339 - 352.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads65 ( #13,961 of 549,065 )Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #37,252 of 549,065 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
