Are value judgments synthetic a posteriori?
Ethics 89 (1):35-57 (1978)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,701 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesWillem R. de Jong (2010). The Analytic-Synthetic Distinction and the Classical Model of Science: Kant, Bolzano and Frege. Synthese 174 (2).
Seung-Kee Lee (2009). The Synthetic a Priori in Kant and German Idealism. Archiv für Geschichte Der Philosophie 91 (3):288-328.
R. Lanier Anderson (2008). Review: Comments on Wayne Martin, Theories of Judgment. [REVIEW] Philosophical Studies 137 (1):91 - 108.
Quentin Smith (1996). Causation and the Logical Impossibility of a Divine Cause. Philosophical Topics 24 (1):169-191.
Oliver A. Johnson (1960). Denial of the Synthetic A Priori. Philosophy 35 (134):255-.
Carol A. Van Kirk (1986). Synthesis, Sensibility, and Kant's Philosophy of Mathematics. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1986:135 - 144.
Jennifer McCrickerd (2001). Moral Judgments and the Analytic/Synthetic Distinction. Journal of Philosophical Research 26:423-433.
Jason S. Baehr, A Priori and a Posteriori. Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Analytics
Monthly downloads
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
|
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads1 ( #274,921 of 549,122 )Recent downloads (6 months)0How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
