Deciding about your Health Care: The Ethicist as Policy-Maker [Book Review]

Health Care Analysis 9 (3):265-281 (2001)
The author demonstrates that professional bioethics is culturally very risk averse when it comes to evaluating the possible ethical consequences of new technologies such as genetic testing, human embryonic stem cells, and reproductive cloning. Deeper involvement in the Federal regulatory process by bioethicists will exacerbate this tendency toward risk aversion. This cultural bias toward caution will tempt many bioethicists to look to the so-called precautionary principle for policy guidance. Adopting the precautionary principle would harm patients by slowing the development of new therapies. The author argues that bioethicists should reject the precautionary principle and instead rely on conscientious trial and error as a superior way to approach implementing new biomedical technologies ethically
Keywords bioethics  biotechnology  ethics  genetic enhancement  genetic testing  germline intervention  human embryonic stem cells  life extension  new technology  precautionary principle  regulation  reproductive cloning  risk aversion  therapeutic cloning  xenotransplantation
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1023/A:1012993514088
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
Download options
PhilPapers Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 23,189
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
William M. Sage (2010). Will Embryonic Stem Cells Change Health Policy? Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 38 (2):342-351.
Jonathan Hughes (2006). How Not to Criticize the Precautionary Principle. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 31 (5):447 – 464.
Daniel P. Sulmasy (1993). What's so Special About Medicine? Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 14 (1):379-380.
Bart Gremmen & Henk Van Den Belt (2000). The Precautionary Principle and Pesticides. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 12 (2):197-205.

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

11 ( #384,248 of 1,940,952 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

2 ( #333,819 of 1,940,952 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

Start a new thread
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.