Debate: The normative pluralism of desert
Journal of Political Philosophy 14 (2):226–237 (2006)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,672 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesLouis P. Pojman & Owen McLeod (eds.) (1999). What Do We Deserve?: A Reader on Justice and Desert. Oxford University Press.
Stanislas Breton (2004). The Desert. Philosophy and Theology 16 (2):315-320.
Kristján Kristjánsson (2005). A Utilitarian Justification of Desert in Distributive Justice. Journal of Moral Philosophy 2 (2):147-170.
M. J. Moore (2010). Wittgenstein, Value Pluralism and Politics. Philosophy and Social Criticism 36 (9):1113-1136.
John Kelsay (1996). Review: Plurality, Pluralism, and Comparative Ethics: A Review Essay. [REVIEW] Journal of Religious Ethics 24 (2):403 - 428.
Marc Ereshefsky (1994). Pluralism, Normative Naturalism, and Biological Taxonomy. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1994:382 - 389.
Andrew Light (1996). Callicott and Naess on Pluralism. Inquiry 39 (2):273 – 294.
David R. Mandel (2000). On the Meaning and Function of Normative Analysis: Conceptual Blur in the Rationality Debate? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (5):686-687.
Howard Simmons (2010). Moral Desert: A Critique. University Press of America.
Shelly Kagan (2012). The Geometry of Desert. Oxford University Press.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads20 ( #61,474 of 549,037 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,261 of 549,037 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
