Representations versus regularities: Does computation require representation?
Eidos 12 (1):47-58 (1994)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | Computation Intentionality Language Representation Science Thought | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,672 |
| External links | This entry has no external links. Add one. |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesJohn Haugeland (2002). Authentic Intentionality. In Matthias Scheutz (ed.), Computationalism: New Directions. MIT Press.
Deborah J. Brown (1996). A Furry Tile About Mental Representation. Philosophical Quarterly 46 (185):448-66.
Shimon Edelman (1995). Representation, Similarity, and the Chorus of Prototypes. Minds and Machines 5 (1):45-68.
Brendan Kitts (1999). Representation Operators and Computation. Minds and Machines 9 (2):223-240.
Robert S. Stufflebeam (1997). Why Computation Need Not Be Traded Only for Internal Representation. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 20 (1):80-81.
Lawrence A. Shapiro (1997). Junk Representations. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 48 (3):345-361.
B. Maclennan (2003). Transcending Turing Computability. Minds and Machines 13 (1):3-22.
Eric Dietrich & A. Markman (2003). Discrete Thoughts: Why Cognition Must Use Discrete Representations. Mind and Language 18 (1):95-119.
M. A. (2003). A Quantum Computer Only Needs One Universe. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B 34 (3):469-478.
Analytics
Monthly downloads
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
|
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads0Recent downloads (6 months)0How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
