The third man argument
Philosophy Compass 4 (4):666-681 (2009)
| Abstract | This paper is a brief discussion of the famous 'Third Man Argument' as it appears in Plato's dialogue Parmenides . I mention, criticise and refine the most influential analytic approach to the argument; show that the actual conclusion of the argument is different from the one attributed to it by the majority of scholars; and elaborate two responses to the argument, both of which shed interesting light on the Theory of Forms. | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,701 |
| External links |
|
| Through your library | Configure |
J. M. E. Moravcsik (1963). The 'Third Man' Argument and Plato's Theory of Forms1. Phronesis 8 (1):50-62.
Andrew M. Bailey, Joshua Rasmussen & Luke van Horn (2011). No Pairing Problem. Philosophical Studies 154 (3):349-360.
A. F. Mackay (2005). Aristotle's Dilemma. Journal of Ethics 9 (3-4):533 - 549.
Graham Oppy (2002). Paley's Argument for Design. Philo 5 (2):161-173.
Caj Strandberg (2004). In Defence of the Open Question Argument. Journal of Ethics 8 (2):179-196.
Lee Shepski (2008). The Vanishing Argument From Queerness. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 86 (3):371 – 387.
Michael J. Almeida & Neal D. Judisch (2002). A New Cosmological Argument Undone. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 51 (1):55-64.
Neal Judisch (2002). A New Cosmological Argument Undone. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 51 (1):55 - 64.
Ermelinda Valentina Di Lascio (2004). Third Men: The Logic of the Sophisms at Arist. SE 22, 178b36–170a10. Topoi 23 (1):33-59.
S. Marc Cohen (1971). The Logic of the Third Man. Philosophical Review 80 (4):448-475.
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-06-05Total downloads76 ( #10,619 of 549,122 )Recent downloads (6 months)5 ( #15,205 of 549,122 )How can I increase my downloads? |

