What to Do in an Unjust State?: On Confucius’s and Socrates’s Views on Political Duty [Book Review]

Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy 9 (4):375-390 (2010)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Confucius argued for the centrality of the superior man’s political duty to his fellow human beings and to the state, while Socrates suggested that the superior man (the philosopher) may have no such political duty. However, Confucius also suggested that one not enter or stay—let alone save—a troubled state, while Socrates stayed in an unjust state, apparently fulfilling his political duty to the state by accepting an unjust verdict. In this essay, I will try to show how Confucius could solve these apparent contradictions. I will then examine the reasons Socrates directly and indirectly offers to resolve his seemingly conflicting positions in light of the discussion of the Confucian case. This article is a first step toward a deeper understanding of both Confucius and Socrates (Plato) by way of comparative studies, and of the general issue of a superior man’s political duty to a bad state

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 90,593

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

State Legitimacy and Self-defence.Massimo Renzo - 2011 - Law and Philosophy 30 (5):575-601.
The beginning of ethics: Confucius and socrates.Jiyuan Yu - 2005 - Asian Philosophy 15 (2):173 – 189.
Cosmopolitanism: a defence.Thomas Pogge - 2002 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 5 (3):86-91.
Confucius: his life and thought.Shigeki Kaizuka - 1956 - Mineola, N.Y.: Dover Publications. Edited by Geoffrey Bownas.
Legal obligation as a duty of deference.Kimberley Brownlee - 2008 - Law and Philosophy 27 (6):583 - 597.
The Road from the Analects to Democracy.Gerardo Lopez - 2008 - Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 9:47-52.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-09-13

Downloads
148 (#117,673)

6 months
4 (#319,344)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Tongdong Bai
Fudan University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

A source book in Chinese philosophy.Wing-Tsit Chan - 1963 - Princeton, N.J.,: Princeton University Press. Edited by Wing-Tsit Chan.
Mencius.D. C. Lau - 1984 - Penguin Classics. Edited by D. C. Lau.
A Right of Rebellion in the Mengzi?Justin Tiwald - 2008 - Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy 7 (3):269-282.

View all 9 references / Add more references