David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy 9 (4):375-390 (2010)
Confucius argued for the centrality of the superior man’s political duty to his fellow human beings and to the state, while Socrates suggested that the superior man (the philosopher) may have no such political duty. However, Confucius also suggested that one not enter or stay—let alone save—a troubled state, while Socrates stayed in an unjust state, apparently fulfilling his political duty to the state by accepting an unjust verdict. In this essay, I will try to show how Confucius could solve these apparent contradictions. I will then examine the reasons Socrates directly and indirectly offers to resolve his seemingly conflicting positions in light of the discussion of the Confucian case. This article is a first step toward a deeper understanding of both Confucius and Socrates (Plato) by way of comparative studies, and of the general issue of a superior man’s political duty to a bad state
|Keywords||Confucius Socrates Plato Political duty|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Massimo Renzo (2011). State Legitimacy and Self-Defence. Law and Philosophy 30 (5):575-601.
Roslyn Weiss (1998). Socrates Dissatisfied: An Analysis of Plato's Crito. Oxford University Press.
William A. Edmundson (1998). Legitimate Authority Without Political Obligation. Law and Philosophy 17 (1):43 - 60.
Mary P. Nichols (2004). Socrates' Contest with the Poets in Plato's Symposium. Political Theory 32 (2):186-206.
Dorota Mokrosinska (2012). Rethinking Political Obligation: Moral Principles, Communal Ties, Citizenship. Palgrave Macmillan.
P. J. Markie (2009). Political Obligation and the Particularity Problem. Ratio 22 (3):322-337.
Christopher Heath Wellman (2005). Is There a Duty to Obey the Law? Cambridge University Press.
Jiyuan Yu (2005). The Beginning of Ethics: Confucius and Socrates. Asian Philosophy 15 (2):173 – 189.
Hsei-Yung Hsu, Just State and Just Man : A Dialogue Between Plato and Confucius. PhD Thesis, University of Glasgow.
Thomas Pogge (2002). Cosmopolitanism: A Defence. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 5 (3):86-91.
Shigeki Kaizuka (1956/2002). Confucius: His Life and Thought. Dover Publications.
Kimberley Brownlee (2008). Legal Obligation as a Duty of Deference. Law and Philosophy 27 (6):583 - 597.
Gerardo Lopez (2008). The Road From the Analects to Democracy. Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 9:47-52.
V. A. Rodgers (1999). In Search of Socrates M. L. McPherran: The Religion of Socrates . Pp. Xii + 353. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press, 1996. Cased, $35/£31.50. ISBN: 0-271-01581-0. G. M. Mara: Socrates' Discursive Democracy: Logos and Ergon in Platonic Political Philosophy . Pp. X + 324. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1997. Cased, $65 (Paper, $21.95). ISBN: 0-7914-3299-8 (0-7914-3300-5 Pbk). [REVIEW] The Classical Review 49 (01):106-.
Catherine H. Zuckert (2009). Plato's Philosophers: The Coherence of the Dialogues. The University of Chicago Press.
Added to index2010-09-13
Total downloads51 ( #32,333 of 1,102,758 )
Recent downloads (6 months)10 ( #20,958 of 1,102,758 )
How can I increase my downloads?