What the New Scholasticism Has to Offer Modern Thought in the Field of the Philosophy of Nature
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | No categories specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,701 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesFrancis V. Corcoran (1926). What the New Scholasticism Has to Offer Modern Thought From the Field of Religion and Theology. Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 1:28-34.
Joseph T. Barron (1926). Contributions of the New Scholasticism to Modern Philosophy in the Field of Epistemology. Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 1:43-49.
Henry Alonzo Myers (1939). Scholasticism in Modern Thought. Journal of Philosophy 36 (5):113-124.
Gaven Kerr (2008). The Meaning of 'Ens Commune' in the Thought of Thomas Aquinas. Yearbook of the Irish Philosophical Society 2008:32 - 60.
Richard Percival Phillips (1934). Modern Thomistic Philosophy. London, Burns, Oates & Washbourne.
Charles Huenemann (ed.) (2008). Interpreting Spinoza: Critical Essays. Cambridge University Press.
James V. Mullaney (1945). Essays in Modern Scholasticism. Thought 20 (2):368-372.
H. Rogosin (1938). Telepathy, Psychical Research, and Modern Psychology. Philosophy of Science 5 (4):472-483.
John O. Riedl (1942). The Nature of Thought. The New Scholasticism 16 (4):401-403.
Robert Pasnau (2002). Thomas Aquinas on Human Nature: A Philosophical Study of Summa Theologiae 1a, 75-89. Cambridge University Press.
Analytics
Monthly downloads
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
|
Added to index2011-12-01Total downloads0Recent downloads (6 months)0How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
