Expressivism and Moral Dilemmas: A Response to Marino [Book Review]
Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 14 (4):445-455 (2011)
|Abstract||Simon Blackburnâ€™s expressivist logic of attitudes aims to explain how we can use non-assertoric moral judgements in logically valid arguments. Patricia Marino has recently argued that Blackburnâ€™s logic faces a dilemma: either it cannot account for the place of moral dilemmas in moral reasoning or, if it can, it makes an illicit distinction between two different kinds of moral dilemma. Her target is the logicâ€™s definition of validity as satisfiability, according to which validity requires an avoidance of attitudinal inconsistency. Against Marinoâ€™s arguments, I contend that expressivists following Blackburn are able to show how we appreciate the validity of arguments found in dilemma-contexts, and that Marinoâ€™s argument concerning the distinction between contingent moral dilemmas and logical moral dilemmas rests on a mistake concerning the logical representation of a contingent dilemma|
|Keywords||Blackburn Expressivism Consistency Moral dilemmas Frege–Geach problem|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Patricia Marino (2006). Expressivism, Logic, Consistency, and Moral Dilemmas. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 9 (5):517 - 533.
Alex Rajczi (2002). The Moral Theory Behind Moral Dilemmas. American Philosophical Quarterly 39 (4):373-383.
Jurriaan De Haan (2001). The Definition of Moral Dilemmas: A Logical Problem. [REVIEW] Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 4 (3):267-284.
Patricia Marino (2001). Moral Dilemmas, Collective Responsibility, and Moral Progress. Philosophical Studies 104 (2):203 - 225.
Peter Vallentyne (1992). Moral Dilemmas and Comparative Conceptions of Morality. Southern Journal of Philosophy 30 (1):117-124.
H. E. Mason (ed.) (1996). Moral Dilemmas and Moral Theory. Oxford University Press.
Jurriaan De Haan (2001). The Definition of Moral Dilemmas: A Logical Problem. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 4 (3):267 - 284.
Nick Zangwill (1999). Dilemmas and Moral Realism. Utilitas 11 (01):71-.
Todd Bernard Weber (2002). The Moral Dilemmas Debate, Deontic Logic, and the Impotence of Argument. Argumentation 16 (4):459-472.
Matjaž Potrč & Vojko Strahovnik (2013). Moral Dilemmas and Vagueness. Acta Analytica 28 (2):207-222.
Alan L. Lockwood (1975). Stage of Moral Development and Students' Reasoning on Public Policy Issues. Journal of Moral Education 5 (1):51-61.
Peter Vallentyne (1989). “Two Types of Moral Dilemmas”. Erkenntnis 30 (3):301-318.
Gillian R. Wark & Dennis L. Krebs (2000). The Construction of Moral Dilemmas in Everyday Life. Journal of Moral Education 29 (1):5-21.
Peter Vallentyne (1992). Moral Dilemmas and Comparative Conceptions of Morality. Southern Journal of Philosophy:117-124.
Added to index2010-12-18
Total downloads62 ( #18,282 of 722,874 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #60,917 of 722,874 )
How can I increase my downloads?