David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Australasian Journal of Philosophy 90 (4):641 - 656 (2012)
Are there cases in which agents ought to give up on satisfying an obligation, so that they can avoid a temptation which will lead them to freely commit an even more significant wrong? Actualists say yes. Possibilists say no. Both positions have absurd consequences. This paper argues that common-sense morality is committed to an inconsistent triad of principles. This inconsistency becomes acute when we consider the cases that motivate the possibilism?actualism debate. Thus, the absurd consequences of both solutions are unsurprising: any proposed solution will have consequences incompatible with common moral practice. Arguments for denying one of the principles are considered and rejected. The paper then suggests that the inconsistent moral commitments originate in an inconsistent picture of human agency. Revisionary pictures of human agency are considered. It is argued that a quasi-Platonic picture of agency, similar to that advocated by Gary Watson 1977, is the most promising
|Keywords||Free will Weakness of will Professor Procrastinate|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Erik Carlson (1999). Consequentialism, Alternatives, and Actualism. Philosophical Studies 96 (3):253-268.
A. M. Honoré (1964). Can and Can't. Mind 73 (292):463-479.
I. L. Humberstone (1991). Two Kinds of Agent-Relativity. Philosophical Quarterly 41 (163):144-166.
Rosalind Hursthouse (1999/2001). On Virtue Ethics. Oxford University Press.
Frank Jackson (1998). From Metaphysics to Ethics. Oxford University Press.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Danny Frederick, Adversus Homo Economicus: Critique of Lester’s Account of Instrumental Rationality.
Paul Shapiro (2006). Moral Agency in Other Animals. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 27 (4):357-373.
Neil A. Shankman (1999). Reframing the Debate Between Agency and Stakeholder Theories of the Firm. Journal of Business Ethics 19 (4):319 - 334.
Paul Benson (1990). Feminist Second Thoughts About Free Agency. Hypatia 5 (3):47 - 64.
Elisabeth Pacherie (2010). Self-Agency. In Shaun Gallagher (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of the Self. Oup Oxford.
Eve Garrard (2002). Forgiveness and the Holocaust. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 5 (2):147-165.
Shaun Gallagher (2010). Multiple Aspects of Agency. New Ideas in Psychology.
Jeanette Kennett (2001). Agency and Responsibility: A Common-Sense Moral Psychology. Oxford University Press.
Thor Grünbaum (2011). Commonsense Psychology, Dual Visual Streams, and the Individuation of Action. Philosophical Psychology 25 (1):25 - 47.
Glenn Carruthers (2010). A Problem for Wegner and Colleagues' Model of the Sense of Agency. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 9 (3):341-357.
C. G. Pulman (2011). Where is the Free Agency in Personal Agency? Philosophical Quarterly 61 (244):630-632.
S. Matthew Liao (2010). Agency and Human Rights. Journal of Applied Philosophy 27 (1):15-25.
Abbas J. Ali, Robert C. Camp & Manton Gibbs (2005). The Concept of “Free Agency” in Monotheistic Religions: Implications for Global Business. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 60 (1):103 - 112.
Added to index2011-09-25
Total downloads84 ( #20,035 of 1,692,196 )
Recent downloads (6 months)11 ( #20,491 of 1,692,196 )
How can I increase my downloads?