David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 79 (2):251-272 (2005)
The core thesis of Malebranche’s doctrine of occasionalism is that God is the sole true cause, where a true cause is one that has the power to initiate change and for which the mind perceives a necessary connection between it and its effects. Malebranche gives two separate arguments for his core thesis, T, based on necessary connection and on divine power respectively. The standard view is that these two arguments are necessary to establish T. I argue for a reinterpretation of Malebranche’s strategy, according to which the Necessary Connection Argument alone is sufficient to establish T. The Divine Power Argument, which is anyway weaker, is needed not to support T but to bridge the gap between T and full-fledged occasionalism. Specifically, it is needed to rule out the existence of causal powers in nature, a scenario which is consistent with T but inconsistent with occasionalism
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Fred Ablondi (1996). Causality and Human Freedom in Malebranche. Philosophy and Theology 9 (3-4):321-331.
Walter Ott (2008). Causation, Intentionality, and the Case for Occasionalism. Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 90 (2):165-187.
Sukjae Lee (2008). Necessary Connections and Continuous Creation: Malebranche's Two Arguments for Occasionalism. Journal of the History of Philosophy 46 (4):539-565.
Fred Ablondi (2008). François Lamy, Occasionalism, and the Mind-Body Problem. Journal of the History of Philosophy 46 (4):pp. 619-629.
Walter Ott (2008). Régis's Scholastic Mechanism. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 39 (1):2-14.
Antonia Lolordo (2005). Descartes and Malebranche on Thought, Sensation and the Nature of the Mind. Journal of the History of Philosophy 43 (4):387-402.
Andrew Pessin (2000). Malebranche's Doctrine of Freedom / Consent and the Incompleteness of God's Volitions. British Journal for the History of Philosophy 8 (1):21 – 53.
Donald Rutherford (1993). Natures, Laws, and Miracles: The Roots of Leibniz's Critique of Occasionalism. In Steven Nadler (ed.), Causation in Early Modern Philosophy. Penn State University Press
William F. Vallicella (1999). God, Causation and Occasionalism. Religious Studies 35 (1):3-18.
Steven M. Nadler (ed.) (2000). The Cambridge Companion to Malebranche. Cambridge University Press.
Sukjae Lee (2007). Passive Natures and No Representations: Malebranche’s Two “Local” Arguments for Occasionalism. The Harvard Review of Philosophy 15 (1):72-91.
Andrew Pyle (2003). Malebranche. Routledge.
Steven M. Nadler (2010). Occasionalism: Causation Among the Cartesians. Oxford University Press.
Added to index2011-01-09
Total downloads34 ( #139,061 of 1,941,073 )
Recent downloads (6 months)9 ( #103,254 of 1,941,073 )
How can I increase my downloads?