Out of the clash of hermeneutic rules comes ethical decision making: But does it?

Journal of Academic Ethics 4 (1-4):11-38 (2006)
IRBs and REBs use specialized language. A process of definition and re-definition of the situation occurs. That process of interpretation can usefully be considered from the perspective of interpretive social science models involving Symbolic Interaction, Semiotics and Hermeneutics. Seven examples are provided to flesh out the nuances of contextual decision making and the “casuistic” aspects of a balanced approach to complex problems. While many decisions are relatively unproblematic and can follow a template, it is not possible simply to apply a fixed and mechanical approach. Hence, a socialization process occurs in which committee members must learn the actual application of the rules as opposed to the formal requirements. A “tightrope” between overly rigid and overly lax interpretations must be crossed and the more we understand the process of semiosis and the semiotic context the more likely it will be that truly ethical decisions will be “accomplished.” The lack of adequate survey data makes it all the more important to have good theoretical understanding of process
Keywords accomplishment  C. S. Peirce  definition of the situation  evaluation research  hermeneutics  interpretation  negotiated social order  presentation of self  semiotics  symbolic interaction
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s10805-006-9023-3
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
Download options
PhilPapers Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 23,201
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
Erving Goffman (1979). Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 39 (4):601-602.
Umberto Eco (1977). A Theory of Semiotics. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 35 (4):476-478.

View all 15 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

10 ( #412,752 of 1,940,983 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

3 ( #272,533 of 1,940,983 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

Start a new thread
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.