On zero agreement and polysynthesis
| Abstract | Agreement morphology is the single most important way of satisfying this requirement, the other being incorporation. (1) implies that in a polysynthetic language like Mohawk, all verbs necessarily agreement with subjects, objects, and indirect objects, except for the special case when the direct object is incorporated into the verb. This accounts elegantly for paradigms like the following, found also in languages like Nahuatl and Chukchee. | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,701 |
| External links |
  Try with proxy. |
| Through your library | Only published papers are available at libraries |
Similar books and articlesIngrid Harris (1994). “Instincts Into Sacred Cows”: Are Hermeneutical Universalsreducibleto Agreement? Reply to Friedman. Critical Review 8 (1):113-136.
Kent Bach (1995). Terms of Agreement. Ethics 105 (3):604-612.
George Rudebusch (1986). Hoffman on Kripke's Wittgenstein. Philosophical Research Archives 12:177-182.
Miguel Ruiz (2010). The Fifth Agreement: A Practical Guide to Self-Mastery. Distributed by Hay House.
Pieranna Garavaso (1992). The Argument From Agreement and Mathematical Realism. Journal of Philosophical Research 17:173-187.
Martin Gunderson (1979). Threats and Coercion. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 9 (2):247 - 259.
Analytics
Monthly downloads
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
|
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads0Recent downloads (6 months)0How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
