Temporal Becoming: The Argument From Physics

Philosophical Forum 6 (2):218-236 (1974)
Arguments about temporal becoming often get nowhere. One reason for the impasse lies in the fact that the issue has been formulated as a choice between science on the one hand and common sense (or ordinary language) on the other as the primary source of ontological commitment.' Often' proponents of attributing temporal becoming to the physical universe look to everyday temporal concepts, find them infested with notions involving temporal becoming and conclude that becoming is a basic feature of the physical world. Their opponents may look to physical science, find no reference to temporal becoming and conclude that becoming is not part of the extramental universe.2 Thus construed, the issue of temporal becoming is not directly amenable to argument. This stalemate will be broken, however, if I accomplish my aim: to (re)formulate the question of temporal becoming so that it is subject to adjudication; to show how objections to the thesis of the mind-dependence of becoming can fruitfully be seen (and in a sense unified) as attacks on a single argument for the thesis, an argument from physics; and to defend the con'elusion of the argument from physics from heretofore unanswered objections. The question of the status of temporal becoming is the question of the status of past, present and future.' Events which are at one time in the future, are said to become present and subsequently to recede into the past. Since past and future can be defined as 'earlier than now' and 'later than..
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
Download options
PhilPapers Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 22,707
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Daniel Deasy (2015). The Moving Spotlight Theory. Philosophical Studies 172 (8):2073-2089.
Daniel Deasy (2016). Philosophical Arguments Against the A‐Theory. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 97 (2):n/a-n/a.
Paul Fitzgerald (1985). Critical Notice. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 15 (4):695-705.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Joseph Diekemper (2004). Temporal Necessity and Logical Fatalism. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 104 (3):287–294.
Tom Stoneham (2003). Temporal Externalism. Philosophical Papers 32 (1):97-107.
Storrs McCall (1976). Objective Time Flow. Philosophy of Science 43 (3):337-362.
William Seager (1999). The Reality of Now. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 13 (1):69 – 82.

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

112 ( #37,462 of 1,939,000 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

7 ( #83,583 of 1,939,000 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

Start a new thread
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.