The Principled Case for Employing Private Military and Security Companies in Interventions for Human Rights Purposes
Journal of Applied Philosophy 29 (1):1-18 (2011)
|Abstract||The possibility of using private military and security companies to bolster the capacity to undertake intervention for human rights purposes (humanitarian intervention and peacekeeping) has been increasingly debated. The focus of such discussions has, however, largely been on practical issues and the contingent problems posed by private force. By contrast, this article considers the principled case for privatising humanitarian intervention. It focuses on two central issues. First, does outsourcing humanitarian intervention to private military and security companies pose some fundamental, deeper problems in this context, such as an abdication of a state's duties? Second, on the other hand, is there a case for preferring these firms to other, state-based agents of humanitarian intervention? For instance, given a state's duties to their own military personnel, should the use of private military and security contractors be preferred to regular soldiers for humanitarian intervention?|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
George Andreopoulos & Shawna Brandle (2012). Revisiting the Role of Private Military and Security Companies. Criminal Justice Ethics 31 (3):138-157.
Paolo Tripodi & Jessica Wolfendale (eds.) (2011/2012). New Wars and New Soldiers: Military Ethics in the Contemporary World. Ashgate.
Jessica Wolfendale (2008). The Military and the Community: Comparing National Military Forces and Private Military Companies. In Andrew Alexandra, Deane-Peter Baker & Marina Caparini (eds.), Private Military and Security Companies: Ethics, Policies and Civil-Military Relations. Routledge.
J. Pattison (2012). The Legitimacy of the Military, Private Military and Security Companies, and Just War Theory. European Journal of Political Theory 11 (2):131-154.
Clifford Orwin (2006). Humanitarian Military Intervention: Wars for the End of History? Social Philosophy and Policy 23 (1):196-217.
Jeff McMahan (2009). Humanitarian Intervention, Consent, and Proportionality. In N. Ann Davis, Richard Keshen & Jeff McMahan (eds.), Ethics and Humanity: Themes From the Philosophy of Jonathan Glover. Oxford University Press.
Sean D. Murphy (2013). Jus Ad Bellum, Values, and the Contemporary Structure of International Law. Journal of Religious Ethics 41 (1):20-26.
Don Mayer (2009). Peaceful Warriors: Private Military Security Companies and the Quest for Stable Societies. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 89 (4):387 - 401.
Benjamin Perrin (2012). Mind the Gap: Lacunae in the International Legal Framework Governing Private Military and Security Companies. Criminal Justice Ethics 31 (3):213-232.
Andrew Alexandra, Deane-Peter Baker & Marina Caparini (eds.) (2008). Private Military and Security Companies: Ethics, Policies and Civil-Military Relations. Routledge.
Patrick Macklem (2008). Humanitarian Intervention and the Distribution of Sovereignty in International Law. Ethics and International Affairs 22 (4):369-393.
Ana Filipa Vrdoljak, Cultural Rights: The Possible Impact of Private Military and Security Companies.
Marcus Hedahl (2012). Unaccountable: The Current State of Private Military and Security Companies. Criminal Justice Ethics 31 (3):175-192.
M. Kahler (2011). Legitimacy, Humanitarian Intervention, and International Institutions. Politics, Philosophy and Economics 10 (1):20-45.
Added to index2011-12-17
Total downloads21 ( #65,329 of 722,826 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #60,541 of 722,826 )
How can I increase my downloads?