The relationship between moral philosophy and medical ethics reconsidered

Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 17 (3):271-276 (2007)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

: Medical ethics often is treated as applied ethics, that is, the application of moral philosophy to ethical issues in medicine. In an earlier paper, we examined instances of moral philosophy's influence on medical ethics. We found the applied ethics model inadequate and sketched an alternative model. On this model, practitioners seeking to change morality "appropriate" concepts and theory fragments from moral philosophy to valorize and justify their innovations. Goldilocks-like, five commentators tasted our offerings. Some found them too cold, since they had already abandoned applied ethics; others too hot, since they still find the applied ethics model to their taste. We reply that the appropriation model offers an empirically testable account of the historical relationship between moral philosophy and medical ethics that explains why practitioners appropriate concepts and fragments from moral philosophy. In contrast, the now fashionable common morality theory neither explains moral change nor why practitioners turn to moral philosophy

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 90,616

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
80 (#190,806)

6 months
3 (#445,838)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Robert Baker
George Washington University
Laurence McCullough
Baylor College of Medicine

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references