Visibility and the just allocation of health care: A study of Age-Rationing in the British national Health Service

Health Care Analysis 1 (2):139-150 (1993)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The British National Health Service (BNHS) was founded, to quote Minister of Health Aneurin Bevan, to ‘universalise the best’. Over time, however, financial constraints forced the BNHS to turn to incrementalist budgeting, to rationalise care and to ask its practitioners to act as gatekeepers. Seeking a way to ration scarce tertiary care resources, BNHS gatekeepers began to use chronological age as a rationing criterion. Age-rationing became the ‘done thing’ without explicit policy directives and in a manner largely invisible to patients, to Parliament, and to the public. The invisibility of the practice, however, violates the publicity principle that John Rawls and other philosophers believe essential to fairness. BNHS invisible age-rationing practices are thus a test case of the principle that fairness presupposes publicity; they raise the question: is it possible to preserve equitability in a system that uses non-public criteria to allocate scarce resources? To seek an answer, published data on access to end-stage renal disease (ESRD) treatment in Britain and the European Community (EC) are analysed. Among the findings are: that BNHS age-rationing acts as an excuse for denying care to those most likely to need ESRD treatment; and is, moreover, arbitrary and inequitable. It is further argued that no age-rationing policy can sustain visibility, and that, if the BNHS is to be fair to its patients, it must reform its present age-rationing practices, replacing them by a publicly visible, outcome-based rationing policy that rations either in terms of QALYs or triage categories

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 90,593

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

An Ethical Framework for Rationing Health Care.N. S. Jecker & R. A. Pearlman - 1992 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 17 (1):79-96.
Should we ration health care?Nancy S. Jecker - 1989 - Journal of Medical Humanities 10 (2):77-90.
Just caring: Health reform and health care rationing.Leonard M. Fleck - 1994 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 19 (5):435-443.
The Ethics of Health Care Rationing: An Introduction.Greg Bognar & Iwao Hirose - 2014 - New York: Routledge. Edited by Iwao Hirose.
Rationing and the Clinton health plan.Richard D. Lamm - 1994 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 19 (5):445-454.
Must We Ration Health Care for the Elderly?Daniel Callahan - 2012 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 40 (1):10-16.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-24

Downloads
42 (#332,036)

6 months
4 (#319,344)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Robert Baker
Union College

Citations of this work

Gender imbalance in living organ donation.Nikola Biller-Andorno - 2002 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 5 (2):199-203.
“Prioritization”: Rationing Health Care in New Zealand.Joanna Manning & Ron Paterson - 2005 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 33 (4):681-697.
“Prioritization”: Rationing Health Care in New Zealand.Joanna Manning & Ron Paterson - 2005 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 33 (4):681-697.
Health Care Law.Linda Delany - 1993 - Health Care Analysis 1 (2):170-178.

View all 6 citations / Add more citations