Journal of Business Ethics 92 (2):291 - 303 (2010)
|Abstract||This study proposes a conceptual model to explain persistent, accepted-as-normal corporate wrongdoing (hereafter banality of wrongdoing), particularly for high performance organizations. The model describes five explanatory variables: the culture of competition, ends-biased leadership, missionary zeal, legitimizing myth, and the corporate cocoon. Our thesis is that the nature of competition drives both legitimate and illegitimate goal-seeking to adopt an iconoclastic (rule-breaking) orientation. High performance organizations are favorable hosts for wrongdoing because high performance requires aggressive behavior at the ethical margins of what is acceptable. The way leadership reacts to competition sets the stage for ethical or unethical cultures to develop. Ends-biased leadership will project strong vision, using ideology and legitimizing myth as tools to inspire and motivate. The resulting missionary zeal justifies using questionable means because of the perceived value of the end. One critical method for building strong culture is creating a sense of being separate and apart from the ordinary. This cocoon effect may create a self-referential value system that is significantly at odds with mainstream culture and in which wrongdoing is banal. We intend an empirical study of the variables described in this model.|
|Keywords||banality missionary zeal legitimizing myth corporate cocoon culture of competition ends-biased leadership|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Deanne N. Hartog & Frank D. Belschak (2012). Work Engagement and Machiavellianism in the Ethical Leadership Process. Journal of Business Ethics 107 (1):35-47.
Michael E. Brown (2010). Do Ethical Leaders Get Ahead? Business Ethics Quarterly 20 (2):215-236.
Robert W. Armstrong, Robert J. Williams & J. Douglas Barrett (2004). The Impact of Banality, Risky Shift and Escalating Commitment on Ethical Decision Making. Journal of Business Ethics 53 (4):365-370.
Dilek Zamantili Nayir & Christian Herzig (2012). Value Orientations as Determinants of Preference for External and Anonymous Whistleblowing. Journal of Business Ethics 107 (2):197-213.
John Lipinski, Adele Queiroz, Jaime C. Rubin & M. J. Paula Soruco (2005). Corporate Wrongdoing. Proceedings of the International Association for Business and Society 16:263-266.
Craig E. Johnson (2012). Organizational Ethics: A Practical Approach. Sage Publications.
Marcia P. Miceli (2004). Does Type of Wrongdoing Affect the Whistle-Blowing Process? Business Ethics Quarterly 14 (2):219-242.
Susan Ayers & Steven E. Kaplan (2005). Wrongdoing by Consultants: An Examination of Employees' Reporting Intentions. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 57 (2):121 - 137.
Tim Barnett, Ken Bass & Gene Brown (1996). Religiosity, Ethical Ideology, and Intentions to Report a Peer's Wrongdoing. Journal of Business Ethics 15 (11):1161 - 1174.
Added to index2009-07-11
Total downloads26 ( #53,576 of 722,813 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #60,541 of 722,813 )
How can I increase my downloads?