July 25, 2006
|Abstract||Along the way, I will argue, based on work by Wang (2006) on Chinese, that wh-phrases themselves occur in [Spec, FocP], and that sluicing is really TopP deletion (i.e., deletion of the complement of Foc0). It will be shown that this analysis provides a natural account of why, in so-called “doubly-filled Comp” languages such as Norwegian, Bellinzonese, and Belfast English, the overt complementizer cannot be stranded in sluicing.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||No categories specified (fix it)|
|External links||This entry has no external links. Add one.|
|Through your library||Only published papers are available at libraries|
Similar books and articles
Theodore Walker & Mihály Tóth (eds.) (2008). Whiteheadian Ethics: Abstracts and Papers From the Ethics Section of the Philosophy Group at the 6th International Whitehead Conference at the University of Salzburg, July 2006. Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
Mark Wynn (2006). A Response to Cordry on Design. Religious Studies 42 (3):291-297.
J. Angelo Corlett (2006). Editor's Choice of Books Received (July 2005–August 2006). [REVIEW] Journal of Ethics 10 (4).
Alex Voorhoeve, Should Losses Count? A Critique of the Complaint Model. Choice Group Working Papers.
Anthony Freeman (2006). Joseph A. Goguen: Editor JCS 1994-2006. Journal of Consciousness Studies 13 (6):5-6.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2010-04-12
Total downloads2 ( #232,684 of 549,683 )
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?