Making Life: A Comment on 'Playing God in Frankenstein's Footsteps: Synthetic Biology and the Meaning of Life' by Henk van den Belt (2009)
Graduate studies at Western
Nanoethics 4 (2):129-132 (2010)
|Abstract||Van den Belt recently examined the notion that synthetic biology and the creation of ‘artificial’ organisms are examples of scientists ‘playing God’. Here I respond to some of the issues he raises, including some of his comments on my previous discussions of the value of the term ‘life’ as a scientific concept|
|Keywords||Synthetic biology Theology Philosophy Natural law|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Patrick Heavey (2013). The Place of God in Synthetic Biology: How Will the Catholic Church Respond? Bioethics 27 (1):36-47.
Roger Grainger (2010). The Uses of Chaos. Peter Lang.
J. Lindenmann (2002). Siegel, Schaudinn, Fleck and the Etiology of Syphilis: A Response to Henk Van den Belt. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C 33 (4):751-752.
A. Louie (2011). Essays on More Than Life Itself. Axiomathes 21 (3):473-489.
Edouard Machery (2012). Why I Stopped Worrying About the Definition of Life... And Why You Should as Well. Synthese 185 (1):145-164.
Anna Deplazes-Zemp (2012). The Conception of Life in Synthetic Biology. Science and Engineering Ethics 18 (4):757-774.
Christophe Malaterre (2009). Can Synthetic Biology Shed Light on the Origin of Life? Biological Theory 4 (4):357-367.
Hans-Jürgen Link (2013). Playing God and the Intrinsic Value of Life: Moral Problems for Synthetic Biology? Science and Engineering Ethics 19 (2):435-448.
Added to index2010-07-31
Total downloads29 ( #48,178 of 739,444 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,778 of 739,444 )
How can I increase my downloads?