Australasian Journal of Philosophy 83 (4):523 – 531 (2005)
|Abstract||I offer a new criticism of the argument from vagueness to four-dimensionalism [Sider 2001. The argument is modelled after an older argument for mereological universalism [Lewis 1986 and may be looked upon as a tightened-up and extended version of the latter. While I agree with other critics [Koslicki 2003; Markosian 2004 that the argument from vagueness fails precisely because of this affinity, my recipe for dealing with it is different. I reject the assumption, shared by Sider with his opponents, that synchronic composition and 'minimal diachronic fusion' are sufficiently similar to use considerations inspired by the analysis of the former to bear on the latter. My objection to a crucial premise of the argument from vagueness turns on the relevant aspect of dissimilarity between these two cases|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Dan López de Sa (2006). Is 'Everything' Precise? Dialectica 60 (4):397–409.
Andrew Wake (2011). Spacetime and Mereology. Erkenntnis 74 (1):17-35.
Chad Carmichael (2011). Vague Composition Without Vague Existence. Noûs 45 (2):315-327.
Nikk Effingham (forthcoming). Sider, Hawley, Sider and the Vagueness Argument. Philosophical Studies.
Daniel Nolan (2006). Vagueness, Multiplicity and Parts. Noûs 40 (4):716–737.
Daniel Z. Korman (2010). The Argument From Vagueness. Philosophy Compass 5 (10):891-901.
Donald Smith (2006). The Vagueness Argument for Mereological Universalism. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 87 (3):357–368.
Hud Hudson (2000). Universalism, Four Dimensionalism, and Vagueness. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 60 (3):547-560.
Nikk Effingham (2009). Universalism, Vagueness and Supersubstantivalism. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 87 (1):35 – 42.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads30 ( #40,823 of 549,068 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,185 of 549,068 )
How can I increase my downloads?