Graduate studies at Western
The Monist 83 (3):321-340 (2000)
|Abstract||Although considerations based on contemporary space-time theories, such as special and general relativity, seem highly relevant to the debate about persistence, their significance has not been duly appreciated. My goal in this paper is twofold: (1) to reformulate the rival positions in the debate (i.e., endurantism [three-dimensionalism] and perdurantism [four-dimensionalism, the doctrine of temporal parts]) in the framework of special relativistic space-time; and (2) to argue that, when so reformulated, perdurantism exhibits explanatory advantages over endurantism. The argument builds on the fact that four-dimensional entities extended in space as well as time are relativistically invariant in a way three-dimensional entities are not|
|Keywords||Space and time Special relativity (Physics Generalized spaces|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Call number||BD632.B35 2010|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Yuri Balashov (2000). Enduring and Perduring Objects in Minkowski Space-Time. Philosophical Studies 99 (2):129-166.
Cord Friebe, Persistence in Minkowski Spacetime: The Irrelevance of the Endurance/Perdurance Distinction.
Tobias Hansson Wahlberg (2009). Objects in Time: Studies of Persistence in B-Time. Dissertation, Lund University
Steven D. Hales & Timothy A. Johnson (2003). Endurantism, Perdurantism and Special Relativity. Philosophical Quarterly 53 (213):524–539.
Theodore Sider (1997). Four-Dimensionalism. Philosophical Review 106 (2):197-231.
Yuri Balashov (2000). Persistence and Space-Time. The Monist 83 (3):321-340.
Yuri Balashov (2000). Relativity and Persistence. Philosophy of Science 67 (3):562.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads42 ( #31,717 of 722,947 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #36,864 of 722,947 )
How can I increase my downloads?