Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 90 (2):167-175 (2009)
|Abstract||In an earlier work I developed an argument favoring one view of persistence (viz., perdurance) over its rivals, based on considerations of the relativity of three-dimensional spatial shapes of physical objects in Minkowski spacetime. The argument has since come under criticism (in the works of Theodore Sider, Kristie Miller, Ian Gibson, Oliver Pooley, and Thomas Sattig). Two related topics, explanatory virtues and explanatory relevance, are central to these critical discussions. In this paper I deal with these topics directly and respond to my critics by offering a new perspective on the issue.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Antony Eagle (2010). Duration in Relativistic Spacetime. In Dean Zimmerman (ed.), Oxford Studies in Metaphysics, volume 5. Oxford University Press.
Cord Friebe, Persistence in Minkowski Spacetime: The Irrelevance of the Endurance/Perdurance Distinction.
M. Gregory Oakes (2004). Perdurance and Causal Realism. Erkenntnis 60 (2):205-227.
Ian Gibson & Oliver Pooley (2006). Relativistic Persistence. Philosophical Perspectives 20 (1):157–198.
Yuri Balashov (1999). Relativistic Objects. Noûs 33 (4):644-662.
Yuri Balashov (2000). Persistence and Space-Time. The Monist 83 (3):321-340.
Yuri Balashov (2005). Special Relativity, Coexistence and Temporal Parts: A Reply to Gilmore. Philosophical Studies 124 (1):1 - 40.
Cody Gilmore (2008). Persistence and Location in Relativistic Spacetime. Philosophy Compass 3 (6):1224-1254.
Yuri Balashov (2010). Persistence and Spacetime. Oxford University Press.
Added to index2009-07-31
Total downloads47 ( #23,106 of 549,082 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,317 of 549,082 )
How can I increase my downloads?