Realistic rationalism [1998]: Can we know that platonism is true?
Philosophical Forum 34 (3-4):459–476 (2003)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | No categories specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,709 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesJ. M. Katz (2000). Realistic Rationalism. MIT Press.
Richard L. Tieszen (2011). After Gödel: Platonism and Rationalism in Mathematics and Logic. Oxford University Press.
Mary Leng (2002). Review: Mark Balaguer, Platonism and Anti-Platonism in Mathematics. [REVIEW] Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 8 (4):516-518.
Mark Eli Kalderon (2000). Realistic Rationalism. [REVIEW] Philosophical Review 109 (3):456-459.
Michael Ayers (ed.) (2007). Rationalism, Platonism, and God. Published for the British Academy by Oxford University Press.
J. M. Dieterle (2000). Supervenience and Necessity: A Response to Balaguer. Philosophia Mathematica 8 (3):302-309.
Mark Balaguer (1998). Platonism and Anti-Platonism in Mathematics. Oxford University Press.
Mark Colyvan & Edward N. Zalta (1999). Mathematics: Truth and Fiction? Philosophia Mathematica 7 (3):336-349.
Greg Restall (2003). Just What is Full-Blooded Platonism? Philosophia Mathematica 11 (1):82--91.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads14 ( #83,183 of 549,600 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,397 of 549,600 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
