Response to Open Peer Commentaries on “Prenatal Diagnosis and Abortion for Congenital Abnormalities: Is It Ethical to Provide One Without the Other?”
American Journal of Bioethics 9 (8):6-7 (2009)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,711 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesAngela Ballantyne, Ainsley Newson, Florencia Luna & Richard Ashcroft (2009). Prenatal Diagnosis and Abortion for Congenital Abnormalities: Is It Ethical to Provide One Without the Other? American Journal of Bioethics 9 (8):48-56.
Daniel Sperling (2009). From Iran to Latin America: Must Prenatal Diagnosis Necessarily Be Provided With Abortion for Congenital Abnormalities? American Journal of Bioethics 9 (8):61-63.
Angela Ballantyne (2010). Response to Open Peer Commentaries on “How to Do Research Fairly in an Unjust World”. American Journal of Bioethics 10 (6):4-6.
Robert J. Boyle & Julian Savulescu (2003). Prenatal Diagnosis for "Minor" Genetic Abnormalities is Ethical. American Journal of Bioethics 3 (1):60-65.
David F. Walbert (1973). Abortion, Society, and the Law. Cleveland [Ohio]Press of Case Western Reserve University.
Samuel M. Brown, C. Gregory Elliott & Robert Paine (2013). Response to Open Peer Commentaries on “Withdrawal of Nonfutile Life Support After Attempted Suicide”. Taylor and Francis 13 (3):W3 - W5.
Michael Keane (2008). Response to Open Peer Commentaries on “The Ethical 'Elephant' in the Death Penalty 'Room”'. American Journal of Bioethics 8 (10):5-6.
María Teresa Muñoz Sastre, Céline Peccarisi, Elizabeth Legrain, Etienne Mullet & Paul Clay Sorum (2007). Response to Open Peer Commentaries on "Acceptability in France of Induced Abortion for Adolescents". American Journal of Bioethics 7 (8):3-3.
Mark A. Rothstein & Abigail B. Shoben (2013). An Unbiased Response to the Open Peer Commentaries on “Does Consent Bias Research?”. American Journal of Bioethics 13 (4):W1 - W4.
J. Arlebrink (1997). The Moral Roots of Prenatal Diagnosis. Ethical Aspects of the Early Introduction and Presentation of Prenatal Diagnosis in Sweden. Journal of Medical Ethics 23 (4):260-261.
Daniel Meegan (2008). Response to Open Peer Commentaries on "Neuroimaging Techniques for Memory Detection: Scientific, Ethical and Legal Issues". American Journal of Bioethics 8 (1):1-4.
Christian Simon & Maghboeba Mosavel (2010). Response to Open Peer Commentaries on “Community Members as Recruiters of Human Subjects: Ethical Considerations”. American Journal of Bioethics 10 (3):1-3.
Dagmar Schmitz (forthcoming). A New Era in Prenatal Testing: Are We Prepared? Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy.
Ingrid Burger & Nancy Kass (2009). Response to Open Peer Commentaries for “Ethical Considerations of Providing Screening Tests to Individuals When Evidence is Insufficient to Support Screening Populations”. American Journal of Bioethics 9 (4):1-2.
Maria I. New (2010). Vindication of Prenatal Diagnosis and Treatment of Congenital Adrenal Hyperplasia With Low-Dose Dexamethasone. American Journal of Bioethics 10 (12):67-68.
Analytics
Monthly downloads
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
|
Added to index2010-09-14Total downloads1 ( #275,109 of 551,105 )Recent downloads (6 months)0How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
